There is lively debate about
republishing of RSS feeds on other sites. The argument surrounds
use of RSS feeds from
feed publisher being used in an unfair manner. This includes republishing
entire articles and not displaying sufficient credit to
original source.Before we go into
details you may want to brush up on your understanding of RSS. This will help you fully appreciate and fully understand
issues involved.
I am glad this conversation is happening now as it needs to be made clear what fair use of RSS feeds actually means. There may be webmasters who are republishing RSS feeds in all innocence at
moment not realising
furore that is going on around them with regards to their republishing activities. I would like to help clear up any misunderstandings that surround RSS republishing.
Being an RSS publisher myself who is considering republishing other authors RSS feeds I would like to make sure I am not treading on any toes. I am basing
following RSS republishing etiquette on
good practice that Rok Hrastnik has enthused.
If you wish to republish an RSS feed then you should first consult
publisher with your intentions. This would be an email to
author stating how you wish to reuse their feed and
page or pages
feed will be republished on and
attributions you will make. You will need to clarify some points. If
authors feed contains ads then will they be republished? Will you be monetizing
authors work by placing ads on your republished page? To avoid conflict these issues need to be sorted out.