There is a major difference between making news and “making news.” It is difference between a shotgun and a slingshot.Amateurs can “make news.” They can entice a morning TV crew to take video of a charity event. Or land a mention in a local newspaper column. Or even score a feature story in a trade magazine.
But these are one-time shots that are unlikely to leave an impression on your target audience. Simply “making news” will rarely attract a steady stream of prospects to your door.
Yet even top PR pros tend to focus on “making news.” There are two reasons for this. First, it’s relatively easy to score. Second, boss rarely understands that simply “making news” is virtually worthless to bottom line.
For example: Taco Bell “made news” a few years ago by piggybacking on an international story. The space station SkyLab was losing its orbit and was about to crash through earth’s atmosphere. The world press was obsessed with possibility that debris might strike a major city.
Taco Bell hired a boat to tow a gigantic target out onto Pacific Ocean. If any debris hit target, Taco Bell told world, every American would get a free taco.
The stunt gave news media a strong visual to associate with more abstract story of potential space debris. It also lent a lighter side to a completely out-of-whack media obsession.
Now, I’m not criticizing Taco Bell. This was a great one-time stunt. But in end news coverage did little to attract new customers to Taco Bell. There were no follow-up stories to tell. There was no exciting idea at heart of company’s tactic.
It was a stunt. And a funny one. Nothing more.
Taco Bell “made news.” But it didn’t make news.
Here’s another way of looking at it: “Making news” is pure expense; making news will generate revenue.
The PR Rainmaker understands this crucial difference.
Sometimes “making news” is all you can manage, given your time and resources.