"Do Not Call List"...Death Knell For Leads Programs?

Written by Michael Lemm, FreedomFire Communications


Continued from page 1

5. If leads companies can navigate this challenge successfully....the resulting leads will truly be "quality". They will definitely be interested in being contacted. So this could be a silver lining...or glass half full....situation. However, it could well be at a higher cost than we now see.

6. Now....if you read carefully onrepparttar FTC website, it mentions that there is a period time of which someone can still be contacted.

a. If they were a customer, you may contact them for up to 18 months afterrepparttar 121049 last business transaction.

b. If they requested information (asrepparttar 121050 website says, submitted an inquiry) you can contact them for up to 3 months.

Lead companies will have to provide Date/Time stamps and IP stamps with every lead. Is this hard? No, they do it anyways, so it shouldn't result in large cost increases.

Additionally, all company/personal "prospecting" websites will need to contain language similar to this: "By submitting your information you agree to be contacted by phone, email, or regular mail with information regarding a home based business, secondary income source, or a work from home opportunity." This will bindrepparttar 121051 user to 3 months of being contacted.

All that doom and gloom aside....what we hopefully will see is a drastic reduction of junk lead companies or companies that generate leads not targeted for our industry. Those that navigaterepparttar 121052 impending changes with quality compliant opt-in systems will survive and prosper. Those that don't.....m'bye bye.



Michael is a Moderator for LMForums.com and the owner of FreedomFire Communications.... providing businesses a variety of voice, data, and internet solutions. His free tool for finding the best phone rates in your area will save you a fortune: http://billzilla.com/mscprez


Did YOU Pull That Trigger?

Written by Darlene Styers


Continued from page 1

It becomes more and more difficult for Publishers to use classified ads due torepparttar amount of time required to filter-proof all ofrepparttar 121048 ads.

Submitting articles that are not sp*am-proofed will probably get you nowhere. When a publisher attempts to use your article, if it is found to contain too many triggersrepparttar 121049 publisher may just use another article that is spam-proof.

Some auto-responders used for publishing ezines and newsletters use SpamAssassin to tellrepparttar 121050 publisher which triggers need to be modified before publishing. SpamAssassin also operates a fr*ee service that you can use before submitting your articles and ads. Copy and paste your ad, article or newsletter in message addressed to mailto:spamcheck@sitesell.net and userepparttar 121051 word TEST (case sensitive) as subject. (Notice I did not say "sub*ject line" as that is a trigger). Shortly, you will receive their report telling yourepparttar 121052 score along with an analysis ofrepparttar 121053 item you submitted. It seems that a guideline you can use is: A score below 5 is acceptable; A score of 12-16 means that most filters will reject your communication.

Noticerepparttar 121054 number of times * is used in this article, and you will see how sensitive these filters can be. Sp*amAssassin, afterrepparttar 121055 use of all ofrepparttar 121056 *, gives this article a score of 2.3. _________________________________________________________ Darlene Styers is Owner and Publisher of iNetProfitz Newsletter. Subscribe: http://inetprofitz.2ya.com Contact: iNetProfitz@hcis.net You may reprint this article if you leave this Resource Box in tact and you do not modifyrepparttar 121057 article. ==================================================



Darlene Styers is Owner and Publisher of iNetProfitz Newsletter. http://inetprofitz.2ya.com iNetProfitz@hcis.net You may reprint this article if you leave this Resource Box in tact and you do not modify the article.


    <Back to Page 1
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use