Continued from page 1
Now Which Tracking Method Should You Choose ?
First of all, to be able to decide about this question, you need to know one important thing about search engines : They don't index dynamic pages. This means that pages which are created by using perl (cgi), php or asp are not indexed properly.
Most of
times there is database that delivers
results of some search requests. You can recognize dynamic pages by
question mark and by a repeating of
search terms in
URL or often
links contain several dozens of numbers and letters.
Examples would be :
http://www.domain.net/search.pl?Terms=business%20opportunities or http://www.domain.net/search.asp?chdr84j3339s042kfmdjhwww
The point is, of course there are many great tracking programs and web sites out there but using them in your article resource box doesn't give you a direct link back to your web site. Search engine spiders will not follow them through a cgi-script back to your site and will not even index pages that look like dynamic pages .
To make
last statement clear : Links to your main site but with a question mark won't improve your link popularity, either. So, one of my favourite methods for tracking results has become obsolete : http://www.website.com/?campaignname won't help me. But this is something I just recently discovered......
You Are Missing A Great Chance Of Increased Exposure
This means, you are missing a great chance to get more exposure at
seach engines as you cannot increase your link popularity . Many ezine publishers have an archive of their past issues at their web site and this would mean even further exposure at their web site directly AND indirectly by increased link popularity.
As a result, if you consider writing articles as a promotion me- thod for your Internet business, use your real domain name in your resource box and you will benefit from much better search engine rankings in
long run....
