b) Principal deficiency -

The particle theorists' model does not at all explain how matter particle, that emits a force - carrying particle, realises presence of other matter particle. In other words, model does not explain how emitter of force - carrying particle knows when to emit a particle.

Part II

The Superultramodern Explanation -

According to NSTP (Non - Spatial Thinking Process) theory any basic force of attraction or repulsion is just a form of spatial illusion to non - spatial observer/s, where illusion is modulated or orderly governed by some superhuman thoughts also existing in form of non-spatial feelings. Any experimental evidence in support of particle theorists' explanation is also a form of orderly spatial illusion.

The NSTP theory is at centre of superultramodern science. (Invention of Kedar Joshi (b.1979), Cambridge, UK)

Now conmathematically Russell's paradox is quite easy to resolve. The conmathematical resolution could be stated in just one sentence : As there is no barber who shaves every man who doesn't shave himself, and no one else, likewise there is no set of all sets that aren't members of themselves.

This sentence is justified or explained below.

Suppose there is a barber who shaves every man who doesn't shave himself, and no one else. Now barber himself is a man and supposition requires that barber shave himself if and only if he does not ! This contradiction straightaway implies that supposition is false. That is, there is no barber who shaves every man who doesn't shave himself, and no one else.

The justification of sentence 'there is no set of all sets that aren't members of themselves' goes on similar lines. Conmathematial foundations of mathematics, being very profound and deep, easily absorb shocks of such fuzzy paradoxes, where set theoretical foundations need to be reformulated.