Continued from page 1
Somewhere along
line a predominate number of people began to see natural disasters as accidental or irrelevant to God’s purposes. From this mindset came
belief that God was no longer Sovereign. He no longer controlled
events of history. Also, miracles didn’t happen any more, and it was foolish to believe such nonsense. When revivals brokeout in
20th century, they were opposed by this mindset. Because of
prevalence of this attitude,
20th century would not see
restoration of cities and economies like it did in
First Great Awakening.
The Bible says that we are to believe Him for who He is—Almighty God. Because He is Almighty, He can do anything but fail. As long as we have a heart to believe that God is still
same miracle working God that He has always been, we will experience
miraculous in our lives; however, if we think God has lost control and is weaker than He was during Pentecost, we will miss many supernatural events that are soon coming.
There are two secular movements—one of
18th and one of
19th century that stripped God of His Sovereignty. In his book that he co-authored with Peter Bocchino, Unshakable Foundations: Contemporary Answers to Crucial Questions about
Christian Faith, Norman Geisler talks about
secularization at work during
19th century.
One powerful force that opposed Christianity and is still affecting lives today was a philosophy propounded by a German atheist, Friedrich Nietzche. He’s
intellectual that coined
phrase, “God is dead and we have killed him.” In simple, Nietzche asserted that
myth of God’s existence, which was once widely believed, died, and that
myth of objective values died with him. He believed that there was no meaning to life, except
meaning man gave to it. Hitler was influenced by this philosophy. Another secular force at work during this time came about in
middle of
19th century. In 1859 Charles Darwin published his book on macroevolution, On
Origin of Species. People were ripe for
godless theories it stated. They readily embraced Darwin’s teaching and man was lowered to
level of animals.
One final feature of
Holiness movement, was its split from
Pentecostals because of their belief that “tongues” was
initial evidence of being baptized in
Holy Spirit. When
Azusa outpouring began, people came from around
world to receive
gift of “tongues,” and then carry
gift back to their part of
world.
Typical of what happens when great moves of God break out,
explosion happens first, and then men try to explain
explosion by doctrines later. When one of Charles Parham’s Bible students, Agnes Ozman, received
Baptism of
Holy Ghost and began speaking in tongues, Parham made an assignment for his students. He wanted them to study
Bible, and list every occurrence of Holy Spirit Baptisms in
New Testament. They were then instructed to list
one thing that manifested with it.
Overwhelmingly
students reported “tongues” to be
initial evidence of
Holy Spirit Baptism. Later when
Azusa outpouring was going strong in Los Angeles, California,
Reverend William Seymour, a Holiness preacher who led
early Azusa outpouring, came into conflict over
doctrine of sanctification with William Durham. Durham said that sanctification was a progressive work of holiness being worked out in
believer by
Holy Spirit. He said that
Baptism of
Holy Spirit with
evidence of speaking in tongues was not
work of sanctification but an experience subsequent to salvation.
Sanctification was a work of
Holy Spirit in
life of
believer, which continued
entire lifetime of
believer. Seymour, being a true Holiness preacher who had received
Baptism of
Holy Spirit with tongues, disagreed. He said that salvation was first, then entire sanctification, and then
Baptism of
Holy Spirit with tongues, last. They never resolved
issue and eventually went separate ways.
The issue has never been settled. The Holiness churches that teach “entire sanctification” still believe that sanctification is a Divine work of
Spirit to seal
Salvation experience with power. They are opposed to “tongues” being
sole or initial evidence of
Baptism in
Holy Spirit.
And, then again, there is a group of sincere Christians that believe
Reformed doctrine of Martin Luther. They believe sanctification is a progressive work of
Spirit, continuing throughout
lifetime of
saint. They do not teach "entire sanctification" nor
Pentecostal experience of being baptized in
Holy Spirit and speaking in tongues.
However, some groups in
Reformed tradition believe there is first Salvation, then
Baptism of
Holy Spirit with
evidence of speaking in tongues, and then progressively sanctification of a believer is worked out a believer “walks in
spirit and not
flesh.” Nevertheless, no matter how you pronounce potato, it’s still a potato. If one is hungry for God and seeks a deeper walk, one will find a more intimate, a more satisfying experience of Him if they keep searching for Him.
So, I’ve given you some of
important features of
Holiness movement from its inception in
middle 19th century to its split from
Pentecostal movement of
20th century. One important point to remember from this document is God’s desire to use simple prayers and insignificant people who simply have a burning and passion for God, to reach their community and nations. The Bible warns us against sneering at small beginnings. No matter how big
move, it started with a seed. Once again, I believe that God is stirring up revival winds. The wind of His Spirit is getting ready to fan
flames, until revival is burning out of control. Are you ready?
Terry Dashner Pastor of Faith Fellowship Church Broken Arrow, OK (Sources cited are available)

Writes history articles about faith in early America (918-451-0270).