Hot or Not -- Trends for Prom 2004Written by Blake Kritzberg
Continued from page 1 Fashion influence is drifting, and East is gaining ground: Londoners do their best to dress like Persians, and Bollywood antics make global radar more often. You'll see lovely outcome in those 2004 prom offerings with an elegant sari look and extraordinary hand beading. // Sporty Spice J. Lo lives on in sporty side of Prom 2004, where two-piece gowns (some midriff-bearing) continue to make a splash. This look is not only fresh but practical; those beautiful bodices can be paired with jeans long after prom night's become a matchbook and a memory. "Sporty-prom" fashionistas can augment their costume with sparkling navel gems and exotic paint-on body tattoos. // Celebrity Fashion Can it go any lower? The prom world's not immune from red carpet antics, and several sultry 2004 offerings call for double-sided tape. This year's 'necklines' sometimes plunge so far that there's nowhere else to go; look for 'backdrift' to follow (no pun intended) in next few years. // In Truth, 2004 The dresses genuinely in sync with 2004 runways are ultra-feminine pastels, with delicate ruffles. Think "prom dress meets park." Don't be afraid to go with soft green, coral and pink paeons to girlhood, simply because most offerings are jewel-toned and sizzlingly seductive. // Hair Soft, shiny waves are new for spring (think lovely Charlize Theron at Golden Globes); Aniston-straight is out. Whatever you do, don't torture your hair into some unnatural confection; it's simplicity and naturalness that updates these retrospective looks. // Shoes Clunky is dead. Open-toed stilettos are red-hot. Sure, gorgeous silver (or transparent) sky-high creations on market are ultimate in impracticality. The romantic prom-goer will buy them anyway, get a great pedicure, and slip them off halfway through night for a 'best of both worlds' (if not 'best for pocketbook') experience. // Jewelry and Makeup With all those strapless fashions, take care not to over-accessorize. Unless you're going for a vintage look, don't spoil that beautiful expanse of clavicle with a necklace; don sparkly, dangling earrings instead to create a long line. If Nicole Kidman look is more to your taste, consider one of those retro multi-strand chokers (in black, of course), or a slim black ribbon paired with a silk rose. Chandelier earrings might be "outre" at Oscars, but they're definitely not a done deal at Prom 2004.

Blake Kritzberg is proprietor of the Prom Dress Guide 2004, at http://www.prom-dress-guide.com/ Visit the site for 2004 prom offerings, news and trends.
| | Should I Give Up Me To Not Lose You?Written by Margaret Paul, Ph.D.
Continued from page 1
Joe is extremely neat, while Julia has a hard time putting things away. Roberta is always on time while Cecelia is always late. Maggie is a spender while David is a saver. Carl has a high sex drive while Andrea has a low sex drive. Angie is an authoritarian parent while Curt is a permissive parent. Ronald is highly social while Greg is a homebody. Depending upon whether or not each person is open to learning, these differences can lead to: Constant conflict One partner giving in to avoid conflict Both partners opening to learning and growing as a result of their differences The outcome of these conflicts depend entirely upon intent. There are only two possible intents in any given moment: The intent to protect against pain or intent to learn about loive. When one or both partners have intent to protect against pain, then they will find many controlling ways of avoiding dealing with differences. They may argue, defend, withdraw, blame, give in, resist, explain, and so on, Each is intent on having their way, not being controlled by other, or avoiding other’s rejection. This will always lead to distance and unhappiness in relationship. The problem is not in differences themselves, but rather in unwillingness to learn and grow from differences. When both partners are open to learning about their differences, their differences become fertile ground for exciting process of personal and spiritual growth and healing. We cannot make another person be open to learning – we don’t have that control over others. If you are in a relationship where your partner refuses learn and grow from differences, then you need to be honest with yourself regarding how much of yourself you can give up and still maintain a sense of integrity. You cannot afford to compromise your personal integrity. You can bend and accommodate as long as you do not feel as if you are losing yourself. Once you feel that you are losing yourself to preserve relationship, you will likely find yourself so resentful of other person that relationship begin to fall apart anyway as a result of giving yourself up. You are not preserving it by accommodating – you are destroying it while losing yourself. The key is to be willing to come up against conflict and rejection, and even lose other person rather than continue to accommodate when going along with what your partner wants means a loss of your personal integrity. On emotional and spiritual level, you can afford to lose your partner but you cannot afford to lose yourself.

Margaret Paul, Ph.D. is the best-selling author and co-author of eight books, including "Do I Have To Give Up Me To Be Loved By You?", "Do I Have To Give Up Me To Be Loved By My Kids?", "Healing Your Aloneness","Inner Bonding", and "Do I Have To Give Up Me To Be Loved By God?" Visit her web site for a FREE Inner Bonding course: http://www.innerbonding.com or mailto:margaret@innerbonding.com
|