Continued from page 1
Single Opt--In Discussion --------------------------------
An argument in favor of single opt--in states it is simpler to subscribe to a single opt--in list than
double opt--in list. Even though
single opt--in method has more un-subscribes,
net number of subscribers is generally higher than with
double opt--in method.
An argument against
single opt--in method states that new subscribers may be:
* Tire kickers only looking for
fr^ee bonus, * Not really interested in your mark^eting efforts, * Can not remember signing-up, * Did not sign-up due to someone else signing them up or * There was a typographical mistake in
sign-up process.
How many of
single opt--in subscribers fall into this “problem” category? Depending on
reporting source it ranges from 0 to 30 percent. Malice or typo mistakes can be mitigated in
confirmation process if
recipient does not confirm. As a result, you will probably lose these people in short order through
unsubscribe process. However,
most serious consequence is
sp^am complaint. This can cause you significant grief and wasted time defending yourself against
ISP that wants to shut you down.
Double Opt--In Discussion ---------------------------------
Depending on your situation, you may need or want to start using
double opt--in method. This does not mean you trash all your current single opt--in subscribers and ask them to double opt--in. You should be able to continue your e-mail mark^eting to these individuals if you have a healthy business relationship with them. Consider
double opt--in method if you are in
early stages of building your list or want to increase to your existing list.
The double opt--in method may be your best solution to
problem of single opt--in subscribers that don’t want to be on your mailing list. The confirmation process is your protection against individuals claiming you are sending them unsolicited e-mail. The double opt--in method establishes that:
* The e-mail a^ddress is good. * The responder is
owner of
e-mail a^ddress. * The responder wants to join your mailing list.
Some significant reasons to use double opt--in include:
* To attract interested and responsive subscribers in your targeted niche. * Improve
chances your subscribers will see your message. * A^dvertisers will place a higher value on your receptive subscriber list. * Ability to more effectively market your products and services to your list. * Documented proof that subscribers requested to be on your mailing list. * Reduce
probability your ISP will shut you down due to a sp^am complaint.
An argument against double opt--in is that
number of individuals completing
confirmation stage is lower than those signing-up in
initial subscription stage. This is usually due to:
* Faulty typing by
subscriber. * Malice by
subscriber. * Problem with input processing at
point of sign-up. * Wrong or incomplete information at sign-up becomes a surprise during confirmation. * The request for confirmation looks like a legal document.
As a result, it should be expected that
recipient will not complete
confirmation phase. The list operator should make
confirmation request as short and simple as possible.
Conclusion --------------
In conclusion, there is no easy answer to
single versus double opt--in issue. You need to weigh
pros and cons of each method, perform tests on each method and then select
method that is right for your business.
It’s possible that you could wind up with a hybrid solution. In other words, use
single opt--in method for your directly controlled programs like mini-courses and your newsletter and use
double opt--in approach for your co-registration programs.
There is no silver bullet in determining
best method to handle sign-ups. You need to experiment. Whatever you do, don’t shoot yourself in
foot. You want to build your business and not destroy it.
I wish you
best of success in your online business activities.
============================================ Copyright © 2004 F. Terrence Markle – All Rights Reserved Get
FR^EE e-mail course on list building “How To Build Your Own Opt--In Mailing List” at: http://www.QuikSystems.com/OIC/OpInCourse.htm ============================================

Copyright © 2004 - F. Terrence Markle has worked for over 20 years with public and private companies. He has an MBA in marketing and finance. He has been involved with Internet-related businesses for over 3 years. His primary focus is the marketing of affiliate programs. http://www.quiksystems.com