Continued from page 1
4. Am I trying to accomplish things that plain HTML can't?
One consideration to make is whether a static, HTML site will do justice to your content. If your site needs to come to life in some way because it will engage your audience better, then Flash could be
answer.
5. Will I still have good exposure on
search engines if I use Flash?
Doing too much in Flash will sacrifice exposure on
search engines. In other words,
engines will not have enough text on which to base their indexing. If access to your site through
search engines is important to your success, be sure that you don't overdo it on
Flash side.
6. Do I rely on non-vector graphics?
Non-vector graphics, such as photographs, are not easy for Flash to process. This means that animations in Flash using this type of imagery will get easily bogged down.
Another concern is that Flash does not cache (or store) non-vector images, therefore they must be reloaded each time. Not a pleasant thing for your visitors! This is in contrast to HTML-based scenarios where
browser will cache
imagery for instant retrieval.
As you can see, Flash is not always
right solution. This is true of any aspect of Web development, where you need to research your options carefully and choose
right combination of tools that works best for you. If you seek outside help, make sure you find a team with
right expertise and a solid track record to back it up. Good luck!

Josh Barinstein is President of Red Frog, Inc., the Southern California ad agency that provides worry-free experiences and powerful results in the areas of Marketing, Print design, and Web/CD-ROM development.
Learn more at www.RedFrogInc.com or by calling us at 888-955-0550.