Will This Gift Keep On Giving?

Written by Charles Payne


Was last week a gift fromrepparttar heavens? Isrepparttar 112751 worst over? These arerepparttar 112752 questions that everyone is asking himself/herself as we head into a new week with a head of steam and a northerly directional bias. Haverepparttar 112753 rains cleared, hasrepparttar 112754 lava cooled? Or was last week a sick joke of nature, sort of likerepparttar 112755 duck-billed platypus? Was it only natural thatrepparttar 112756 markets finally rebounded?

I know I’m supposed to be answering these questions, not asking them, but I have to throwrepparttar 112757 questions and topics out there before tackling them. The short answer is I’m not sure to any ofrepparttar 112758 questions above, but let’s view them from all sides and see what we come up with.

First, I don’t think there was divine intervention involved in last week’s action. I do believe that there were certain events in America that probably answered a few prayers. (Byrepparttar 112759 way, if those trapped miners in Pennsylvania had been rescued duringrepparttar 112760 week, it would have provided a spark torepparttar 112761 action. Thoughrepparttar 112762 comparisons are unfair I couldn’t help but think of how decisiverepparttar 112763 response torepparttar 112764 emergency was compared torepparttar 112765 Russian attempt to saverepparttar 112766 Kursk a few years ago.)

The biggest prayer was one seeped in anger and even hatred, and that was forrepparttar 112767 open arrest of a big-time CEO. Whenrepparttar 112768 Regas family was led away in cuffs,repparttar 112769 market was already climbing offrepparttar 112770 mat, butrepparttar 112771 news superchargedrepparttar 112772 rebound effort and many speculators that had been waiting patiently found themselves in a position where they had to jump first and ask questions later.

It almost makes Americans come across as Huns, butrepparttar 112773 blood lust was atrepparttar 112774 top of many disgruntled investors wish lists. Still, that wasn'trepparttar 112775 type of gift that has a very long shelf life. It was a momentary situation that only whets our appetites for more. However, investors cannot live on revenge alone. They needrepparttar 112776 shelter of a strong economy,repparttar 112777 warmth of growing earnings, and of course safety from a system of checks and balances that work.

So that takes us to question number two, isrepparttar 112778 worst over? I’d sayrepparttar 112779 worst isn’t over, if consumers stop spending, if there are more high profile scandals (I can’t believe how many of Wall Streets top pros are saying that companies like Citibank are buys on weakness because they’re too big forrepparttar 112780 government to topple or expose) or if corporate profits don’t return (deflation is still a greater probability than a double dip recession).

Yesrepparttar 112781 rains cleared for a few days butrepparttar 112782 clouds of doubt still hover above. I'd say either stay inrepparttar 112783 Ark or nearrepparttar 112784 gangplank. The lava has cooled, but it is still too hot to relax or drop one's guard. Yes, this market is like an animal that doesn't know if it is fowl or fish. So far this year, those that have felt thatrepparttar 112785 worst was over have suffered cruelty fromrepparttar 112786 stock market. It would be absurd not to still show vigilance to such possibilities again.

That brings me to even more sinister thoughts and questions. Was last week’s gift a Trojan horse? The shorts are always going to short. It becomes a lot more difficult for them to spread their message and manipulaterepparttar 112787 market ifrepparttar 112788 forward PE forrepparttar 112789 S&P is below 20, as opposed to above 30.

Sometimes they pick certain points to cover and lure in anxious watchers that have had cash burning a hole in their pockets. The ensuing rally provides them with another chance to re-shortrepparttar 112790 market and spread their message of doom with better conviction. I thinkrepparttar 112791 shorts last week had little choice on Wednesday except to get out ofrepparttar 112792 way. But, they’ll be back.

Tax Treatment for Coverdale IRAs

Written by Tony Novak


A number of publications, including my own, have mistakenly reported overrepparttar past year that Coverdale IRAs, formerly known as Education IRAs, are tax deductible. Coverdale IRAs are not tax-deductible.

Originallyrepparttar 112750 concept of education IRAs was meant to provide a tax-deductible benefit that would defer taxes on contributions untilrepparttar 112751 time of withdrawal, butrepparttar 112752 accounts were limited in size to only $500 per year. Due torepparttar 112753 small allowable account size, these Education IRAs were not very popular with savers of financial institutions. Then in 2001repparttar 112754 amount ofrepparttar 112755 allowable contribution was increased to $2,000 for individuals with an income up to $95,000 or couples filing jointly with an income up to $190,000. Butrepparttar 112756 contribution is not deductible from taxable income for federal income tax purposes inrepparttar 112757 same manner as a traditional IRA account.

One possible “work around” to achieverepparttar 112758 immediate tax deferral benefit of deductibility is to make a regular tax deductible IRA contribution if you qualify, and then make a penalty-free withdrawal for education purposes in a later year. Education expenses are one ofrepparttar 112759 special IRA withdrawals allowed that are exempt from early withdrawal penalties.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use