It seems to be in vogue these days to downplay
importance of web traffic. It's popular (and perfectly valid) to say things like: "Traffic is worthless if you don't turn it into money." Excellent point, but this assumes that you actually have some traffic to begin with. Each step of
Internet Marketing Process is not just important - it's required for success. So, let's focus today on getting traffic to your site, and remember:
A. Getting traffic to your site is like putting gas in your car. You can have a great engine, but it won't go anywhere without
gas. Likewise, you can have a perfect sales letter - but without traffic, it's just pretty to look at.
B. The highest traffic sites of
world do not just get a little more traffic than
next guy - they get exponentially more traffic than
next guy. For example, according to Media Metrix, AOL's network weighed in at #1, getting more traffic than any other site in
world in April of 2001. Amazon was ranked #10. Both are top ten sites... And
difference? AOL had 89,000,000 visitors that month and Amazon had 19,000,000. That's a whopping difference of 70,000,000 visitors between
#1 site and
#10 site.
Interestingly,
higher up
ranks you go,
greater
gap between each site.
So, what's
difference? Why is it that
better a site gets,
further behind it leaves its closest competitor? Here are their secrets:
1. They Set Up "Multiple Streams of Traffic"
Back in 1995 I observed an interesting phenomenon. I found that
likelihood of someone responding to your website was highly dependent on
path they took to get there.
People may ask you "what is
conversion rate of your website," but that is really an irrelevant question. Conversion rates are meaningless unless they take into consideration how someone gets to your website. (Test this yourself and you'll find it to be true.)
So, I coined
phrase "All Clicks are Not Created Equal." For example, traffic from a site recommending your product is more likely to generate a sale than traffic from a site criticizing your product. That's an extreme example, but you get
point, right?
When people discover this, their natural tendency is to start getting picky about how they get their traffic. Why waste your time on traffic that won't generate a sale, right?
If you're paying for advertising, this makes perfect sense. However, many people mistakenly throw away traffic from free sources as a result.
High traffic sites never throw away traffic and constantly endeavor to set up new traffic streams.
Let's take
worst possible traffic source imaginable: FFA pages. Traffic from FFA ads is extremely sparse. To make matters worse, this traffic is rarely
source of an immediate sale. Very little amounts of
lowest quality traffic in
world - yep, I think that qualifies it as
worst possible traffic source.
If, however, you have an automated FFA promotion going that doesn't take you any time to maintain and still brings in traffic, should you throw it away?
Maybe not...
I still have in place free automatic traffic building sources that I set up years ago. Much of
traffic that comes from these free sources is of low quality, but hey, I don't lift a finger to get it any more.
Most super-high-traffic sites are constantly working on new ways to bring in traffic - many of which are not very sophisticated at all. Even Yahoo, for example, uses a low-budget "tell a friend" script on their site to encourage people to forward articles to their friends. Does Yahoo care that anyone can do this with a free CGI script? Of course not. It's just one of thousands of traffic sources they've established.
When you read #3 below, you'll realize why "low-quality" traffic may not be so bad after all...
Remember, though, if you're paying for "cheeseburger" traffic, don't pay a steak-and-lobster price. Better: get your cheeseburger traffic for free from as many automated sources as you can.
2. They Use Viral Marketing
"Viral Marketing" was
vogue buzz-phrase of 1999. Several books have been written on
subject in hopes of cracking
code, but still very few sites are taking advantage of this incredible concept.