Why FrontPage XP?

Written by Richard Lowe


I must admit that I use Microsoft FrontPage quite a bit. It's not that I am particularly fond ofrepparttar product, it's just that FrontPage has a very simple, easy-to-use WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor. This is especially true of it's support for tables and lists. In fact, I'd venture to say that FrontPage has by farrepparttar 134541 best WYSIWYG editor onrepparttar 134542 market.

I began using FrontPage many years ago, when it was a free add-on to Internet Explorer called FrontPage Express (if there was a paid version available atrepparttar 134543 time I didn't know about it). One day I remember receiving a copy of Microsoft Office with a demonstration disk for FrontPage 97. It sounded interesting so I tried it out.

The product was very nice, and even that early inrepparttar 134544 HTML editor game it was in many ways superior to what we have onrepparttar 134545 market today. However, onrepparttar 134546 downside, FrontPage 97 crashed a little more often that I would have liked (but hey, it's a Microsoft product, so I was used to this and didn't really think much of it at all) and it had this annoying habit of thinking it knew better that I did.

The entire Office suite has this problem:repparttar 134547 products try very hard to prevent you from doing something that is not "correct". In FrontPage, for example, there are times when it will not allow you to resize a table for no apparent reason. The program simply seems to think it's a dumb idea and will not let you do it.

FrontPage 98 was a vast improvement overrepparttar 134548 previous version, and I quickly upgraded. By now, however, I was learning a bit more and had discarded many ofrepparttar 134549 features thatrepparttar 134550 product offered. First to go was templates - these are a great idea butrepparttar 134551 implementation, quite frankly, sucks. Not only isrepparttar 134552 style of any FrontPage site created from templates so recognizable that it screams "amateur" to everyone, they simply do not buy you very much inrepparttar 134553 way of ease of web site creation. Templates seem designed to limit a person into a specific, Microsoft approved style of web site design, and that design is, well, stupid.

Next to get thrown out wasrepparttar 134554 automatic upload feature. You see, FrontPage has a wonderful feature (well, it would be wonderful except ...) which will upload all of your changes (and only your changes) to your web site. Unfortunately,repparttar 134555 implementation is completely lame. FrontPage will not transfer CGI and perl routines in ASCII, and thusrepparttar 134556 upload feature cannot be used on a web site which uses CGI. To top that off,repparttar 134557 upload feature is so awesomely slow that it's possible to believerepparttar 134558 design specification requiredrepparttar 134559 slowness to be built intorepparttar 134560 product. It's so slow that it's hard to believe this could have happened by accident.

Hover buttons are a great looking feature, but as with many other FrontPage extrasrepparttar 134561 implementation is lame. The form handling of FrontPage is so poorly implemented that I found it completely unusable and installed my own CGI routines (thus leading torepparttar 134562 issue described inrepparttar 134563 previous paragraph). The dynamic HTML features are quite simply awesome, but againrepparttar 134564 implementation is lame.

Product Review: FrontPage 2000

Written by Richard Lowe


Several years ago (way back in 1994) I had to put together a heck of a lot of documentation to help me get my job done. I started with Microsoft Word, writing over a thousand pages in a couple of months. This was all documentation about how to manage our mainframe computer system and it's associated application programs.

After a while, I decided it would be better to maintain this set of documents on an intranet instead of as printed manuals. Why? Well, I was so fast at writing and changingrepparttar text thatrepparttar 134540 documents were out-of-date as soon as I printed them. I thought it would be good to store them as a local web site, thus allowing anyone accessing them to always getrepparttar 134541 most recent version.

I looked around briefly for a product which would allow me to create this intranet without too much bother. I rejected most products right away because they required me to learn HTML: I wanted to write documentation, not learn some obscure coding language (I already had learned too many of those and I knew exactly how long and difficult it can be).

Somehow I managed to stumble upon a nice, new (atrepparttar 134542 time) product called FrontPage. I likedrepparttar 134543 program right away, simply because it had a great WYSIWYG editor which made it extremely simple to create web pages. I especially likedrepparttar 134544 way that FrontPage implementedrepparttar 134545 creation and editing of tables.

Understand, I looked at a lot of programs and I've continued looking since that time. Virtually all ofrepparttar 134546 programs that I've seen didn't have a well defined way to create tables. FrontPage was different - tables were (and are) very well implemented.

That was an early version ofrepparttar 134547 program (I think it was FrontPage 97), and it's changed quite a bit inrepparttar 134548 intervening years. FrontPage 97 tended to crash a lot, and FrontPage 98 bombed out even more often. However, FrontPage 2000 turned out to be just about perfect for my needs (which, admittedly were very simple).

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use