Who Does the SEC Serve?

Written by William Cate


Who Doesrepparttar SEC Serve? By William Cate Published May 2001 [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/] [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/globalvillageinvestmentclubwelcome/]

In 67 years,repparttar 112490 SEC hasn't found a way to protect investors from their own stupidity. I'm not sure that you can outlaw stupidity. I'm certain that it can't be done by 20,000 Government lawyers.

The SEC has createdrepparttar 112491 illusion that American stocks are credible investments. This benefitsrepparttar 112492 American brokerage community. The core ofrepparttar 112493 stock fraud problem are some of these brokerage firms. Like J. Edgar Hoover's refusal to investigaterepparttar 112494 Mob,repparttar 112495 SEC doesn't seriously investigate major brokerage firms,repparttar 112496 NASD, orrepparttar 112497 Depository Trust Company (DTC). Ifrepparttar 112498 SEC charged Michael Miliken, why weren'trepparttar 112499 owners of Drexel charged? Why isrepparttar 112500 Federal Reserve charged with investigatingrepparttar 112501 DTC? The Feds own sixty percent ofrepparttar 112502 DTC. It's like askingrepparttar 112503 fox to investigaterepparttar 112504 murder inrepparttar 112505 hen house. The Law and SEC policies usually protectrepparttar 112506 crooks on Wall Street.

The SEC's goal in ending shell sales is to stop stock promoters from defraudingrepparttar 112507 public. Their theory appears to be that increasing costs will discouragerepparttar 112508 crooks from going public. It won't work. It will only drive uprepparttar 112509 cost of raising money for honest business owners and entrepreneurs. Higher costs means more crooks inrepparttar 112510 Market and fewer real business investments. The crooks will move to spinoffs long before most honest business people realize that spinoffs arerepparttar 112511 last low cost option to going public. The SEC will pressure Congress into ending spinoffs. Unlike shells, spinoffs are protected by Section 12 ofrepparttar 112512 1934 U. S. Securities Act. Congress must changerepparttar 112513 Law to closerepparttar 112514 spinoff option. However, excluding honest business people fromrepparttar 112515 Market creates pressure on Congress to reverserepparttar 112516 SEC's regulatory policies. Eventually, Congress will liberalize listing requirements. The cycle will repeat itself. The crooks will continue to "Pump & Dump." Some brokerage firms will steal billions fromrepparttar 112517 public. The farce will continue.

Professional Help Funding Your Company

Written by William Cate


Professional Help Funding Your Company By William Cate Published April 2001 [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/] [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/globalvillageinvestmentclubwelcome/]

It costs money to raise money. Here arerepparttar primary costs in doing an Initial Public Offering (IPO).

Your securities attorney will charge you anywhere from $75,000 to over one million dollars. Quotations for legal services below $75,000 are usually offers to review and edit your filing. Costs rise when your attorney must sign your SEC filing. The usual attorney retainer is $25,000.

Your Certified Public Accountant will charge anywhere from $15,000 to over $250,000 for their audit. They will want at least a $5,000 retainer.

Your underwriter will charge a 3% nonaccountable expense, a 5% accountable expense and expect up to a 10% discount onrepparttar 112489 IPO share price. The NASD limits IPO commissions to 18%. The "apparent" commission is around 15%-16%. Unlessrepparttar 112490 IPO can easily be oversubscribed,repparttar 112491 brokers double their commission by requiringrepparttar 112492 principals to supply 50% or more ofrepparttar 112493 IPO buyers. They receiverepparttar 112494 discount, accountable and nonaccountable expense onrepparttar 112495 IPO buyers supplied byrepparttar 112496 company. This effectively doubles their commission on an IPO.

The underwriter's retainer is halfrepparttar 112497 nonaccountable expense. On a ten-million dollar IPO, this is a retainer of $150,000.

Your Investor Relations firm will want anywhere from $25,000 to $800,000. Until recently, they demanded a large bloc of stock along with their cash fee. The SEC is moving aggressively againstrepparttar 112498 payment of stock for services, especially stock promotion services.

Studies show thatrepparttar 112499 average cost of doing an IPO is about $750,000. The odds of raising money with an IPO are about even. Going public is a high risk game. If you win, you can create a multinational powerhouse. If you lose, it can destroy your company.

Here are two secrets to containing IPO costs. 1. Seek flat fee agreements with professionals. If you agree to an hourly rate, you are givingrepparttar 112500 professional a blank check. I've seen failed IPO efforts that have costrepparttar 112501 company as much as $15 million. The reason forrepparttar 112502 obscene cost wasrepparttar 112503 professionals billing at $1,000 per hour. 2. Don't payrepparttar 112504 entire bill asrepparttar 112505 initial retainer. I try for a formula of one-third retainer against costs. One-third payment whenrepparttar 112506 professional suppliesrepparttar 112507 companyrepparttar 112508 service expected byrepparttar 112509 agreement. The last third when you getrepparttar 112510 positive result that you expect fromrepparttar 112511 professional's service.

Alternatives It'srepparttar 112512 cost and risks of doing an IPO that makes alternative methods of going public attractive. You have three choices: 1. You can userepparttar 112513 Capital Funds Group Stock Exchange strategy [http://www.capitalfundsgroup.com/raiscap/SCORregD.htm] The cost is $20,000 plus audit. You should be trading within a month. You can use your liquidity to attract investors. You can present your investment opportunity to IVCC members, if you meetrepparttar 112514 IVCC requirements.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use