When A Chickenhawk SquawksWritten by The Indy Voice
I admit it, I don't like Karl Rove and almost everything that comes out of his cynical little mouth. If he is brains behind Republican party operation they're headed off of a steep political cliff. With that being said, I do admire his chutzpah, unapologetically saying things as inane as he does,"Conservatives saw savagery of 9/11 in attacks and prepared for war; liberals saw savagery of 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers."Let me first say that this liberal, if I was so inclined, could slap Rove so hard his therapy needing head would spin around his little pencil neck. I would never do such a thing, not because I realize that it wouldn't get me anywhere or make me feel any better but crisis of our President being advised by a moron would not be radically improved. On contrary, slap would probably damage many of few precious brain cells that Karl needs to desperately hold on to. But Karl's strategy of not apologizing for uttering statements that are not based in reality is a good one. Let's look at situation through lens of logic. Karl makes a statement that is so asinine that only most loyal of right wing talking heads would consider it profound. It's so outrageously simple minded and contradictory to reality that it begs for "outrage" from liberals like myself. But I won't entertain such garbage and I beg of you my liberal brethren, do not fall for this distractionary tactic.
| | Joseph Brant and The Hegelian DialecticWritten by Robert Bruce Baird
I admit I am only able to provide guesses as to nature of how elites might convene or make known to each other nature of shared interests at different times. I have traveled in some circles where some of these people are present and I may have overheard a few things from others who work for them but it is pure guesswork in final analysis. The Jacobin Scottish era shows us that Hume, Carlyle and Gibbon where checking with each other and following a plan to minimize lesser nobles or keep them in dark. Who did these people report to in Stuart Royal camp? Bonnie Prince Charlie was opposed by his own general when French did not send troops as promised so we can wonder if people like William of Hesse and De Medicis who appear together shortly after this were involved. Clearly Robespierre fomented a Revolution they needed in order to cleanse over-indulgences of Royals in France. I am pretty sure that Hegelian Dialectic borne of top-down Platonic ideology was a factor. They were playing many sides and some very high personages were left out of loop. The Royal Society included a shadow government and Francis Bacon may have been actual offspring of Queen Elizabeth. At that time we saw a concentration of best minds under auspices of Stuarts. The Stuarts are Milesian BEES and so are Benjaminites like Rothschilds who got De Medicis monopoly and spy network. If you put it together it is worth speculating that a few people like Lord Mountbatten and Pierre Dupont de Nemours are in a position to make or influence decisions. To what degree they get manipulated by their own paladins and how far conflicts in their own midst go is big question mark. The head people of Priory of Sion were often from alchemists in Royal Society so we can speculate that an inner group of people there were of great importance. When Dan Brown (Author of The Da Vinci Code) had tie in to Roslyn and Sinclair Stewarts there he was making a similar guess to what I am saying. The use of myths like Grail legend or other religious denominations they have allowed Masons to start (Mormons, Scientology, Billy Graham and fundamentalism, Calvin, Luther and all rest) are mirrored in Hindu Tradition. They were always in touch with that part of world and China. The Tarim Basin was once a central area that their top people resided. The Basilidae of Hecateus’ family and Basilians who derive therefrom as well as Nestorians are evidence of this in Greco-Roman to recent era. In America they had Toltecs and Mediwiwin who were not always willing to toe line just as Ptolemies like Juba had been unwilling to go along with major power grabs and Brutus was doing to Caesar. These things require a lot of reading and researching and I have done bulk of work to make these things into a continuous and reasonable guess at true history. Thus it often crosses my mind and I have to tell people who are into some of ‘Conspiracy Theories’ such as Jesuits, Rothschilds and rest; that it has always been case for last 5,000 years James Joyce dubbed a ‘nightmare’. It is not one group all on their own, and it is not new. They have tried to let people take part in their own education and government but often this back-fired. I can defend many of things they have done. The time for true change is upon us however.
|
