What is Mark of The Beast

There has been many different kinds of opinions from many different teachers and preachers at what mark of beast is, some think it is a chip placed under skin , some think it scaning persons eye. Each way could work only there is problems with long time use of them. chip could break down under skin and cause sores to break on skin , eyes could be damage from long term scaning from light. The mark of Beast has something to do with persons ability to buy ,sell and save money. What does bible say about mark of beast . The number is wrote like this 600-60-0006 ( this how many numbers that is in your social number) for it is number of a man and his number is Six hundred threescore and six . Man was given a number and it is his social security number.

Revelation chapter 13 : 16, 17, 18

16 And he causeth all , both small and great , rich and poor , free and bond , to receive a mark in their right hand , or in their foreheads :17 And that no man might buy or sell , save he that had mark , or name of beast , or number of his name .18 Here is wisdom . Let him that hath understanding count number of beast : for it is number of a man and his number is Six hundred threescore and six .We can see that anitchrist creates some kind of control over man to hinder his ability to buy ,sell and save he creates a marking system for human beings that unless person has this mark there is no way person can't maintain his life.

Ever since days of Plato, western religious opinion has always been that personal immortality pertains only to rational parts of soul. The biological and emotional parts should be allowed to let go with body. The reason behind this move is not difficult to seek. For one thing, a personal soul without desires and emotions is more likely to be peaceful. For another, nothing but its more divine-like of aspects should be allowed to persist into eternity. But truth of matter is that in more sophisticated of religious deliberations, personal immorality with memory has in fact never been thought of as a desirable commodity. Some, such as more philosophical of Buddhist schools have always held a more radical point of view. It is that if eventual freedom from all sufferings is to be achieved, to let go of biological and emotional is not sufficient. Memory and identity of self that it entails should also be transcended. The reason is that for as long as memory and self-identity persist, personal ambition would continue to lurk. What that nurtures again would be psychological torment. Thus, if all suffering is really to be overcome, all personal interests and concerns (and thus memories) should also be put to rest. To be able to do that, according to Buddhist thought, is to enter state of torment-less bliss called nirvana. This is a state of being free not only from burden old memory, but of any sense of self. It should thus be seen that contrary to popular understanding, nirvana is not a personal kind of place. What that implies is that those who enter would not know who they were. Such a state of being, if I may say so, is quite analogous to situation of Adam and Eve before they ate fruit of ‘tree of life’. Before they ate, according to story, they had no sense of themselves -- being unable to recognize even their own nakedness.

Of course, early Christianity also had much to say about burden of our old and depraved selves. You see, one of its unique claims is that human race does not only inherit genes of Adam and Eve, but also their original sin (what in fact was emergence of memory and self-identity, as I have just indicated). Thus, one of its key battle cries is about renewal of incarnated souls (not unlike Islamic concept of self-directed jihad). It is believed that this could be brought about by an act of faith as facilitated by Divine grace. Only in this way, or so it is said, could soul be redeemed or made ready for kingdom of heaven.

The trouble with such a doctrine is that a couple of subsidiary wrinkles need also to be ironed out. One is belief that departed and redeemed souls are not amnesiacs. They need to know who they were for purpose of final reckoning. The other is belief that straight entry for such personal souls into heaven would bring with them traces of human depravity unfit for what is also supposed to be a holy kingdom. It is thus a case of ‘either-or’ but not both. To tackle this problem, some of those who were supposedly in know were smart enough to propagate idea that disembodied souls would first be herded into a sort of quarantined center or transit hall; and that it is only after final judgment that ones that have really been redeemed would be admitted into heaven. This center or hall is known in Catholic circles as purgatory – a more sanitary sounding kind of place than classical underworld mentioned in Apostle Peter’s account of where Jesus went before his resurrection.