What is Experience Anyway?

Written by Nan S. Russell


I learned in first grade that one plus one equals two. But, that's notrepparttar right equation when counting work experience. We often think we're building experience to help us get ahead. In reality, we're passing time. Ten years working like a cloned Bill Murray in Groundhog Day is not ten years worth of experience. Doingrepparttar 104075 same thing again and again yields an experience formula more like: ten times one equals one.

I used to equate years of work with years of experience. No more. I learned by making plenty of hiring and promotion mistakes in twenty years of managementrepparttar 104076 two are not equal. Neither are years of work and performance. Doing something for five, ten or twenty years doesn't make you automatically five, ten or twenty years better than when you started. I've been cooking for thirty years but I remain a mediocre cook.

Two or three years involved with a business start-up or a new project might provide more growth and knowledge than ten years in a stable venue. And it might not. Gaining experience is more about you and your approach than anything else.

Recurring work events can be predictable, boring, and unchallenging ways of passing years at work if what you're doing is updating last year's memo, tweaking last year's budget, or fine-tuning last years goals without applying innovation, analysis or critical thinking. Retiring onrepparttar 104077 job is as prolific as spam and will get you as blocked as those unwanted emails.

Google IPO and its effect on the Venture Capital Industry

Written by Keith Henry


“Willrepparttar Google IPO have any impact onrepparttar 104074 Venture Capital market?” FundingPost (http://www.FundingPost.com) surveyed 32 Venture Capitalists and Angel Investors for their opinions. FundingPost is happy to share these responses from leading venture investors as it should help guide CEOs of emerging companies who plan on raising capital today:

1) Google raised $25 million from Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. Would you have invested in Google’s Series A round if they had presented to you?

Joe Rubin, Director, FundingPost: “We received mixed answers –repparttar 104075 Angel Investors basically said ‘yes’ as they likedrepparttar 104076 technology."

Atul Madahar, Principal, TL Ventures: “No, because it would have been too difficult for us to really understandrepparttar 104077 superiority of their engine without working code. Also Yahoo wasrepparttar 104078 dominant search engine atrepparttar 104079 time followed by half a dozen other engines, meta-engines, etc.”

Darren Wallis, Venture Partner, Cross Atlantic Capital Partners: “I would have passed on it because I would have thoughtrepparttar 104080 business model would not be sustainable, givenrepparttar 104081 highly-fragmented space at that time. It just shows you that sometimes you have to look pastrepparttar 104082 business model and focus onrepparttar 104083 superior technology. Then,repparttar 104084 technology droverepparttar 104085 business model.”

Eric Janszen, Managing Director, Osborn Capital (Early-stage angel fund) “We have certainly invested in bright students with good ideas out of universities, but not recently. Would we have invested in these particular bright students at that time? I was fortunate enough to meet Google's founders last year at Stanford and was impressed byrepparttar 104086 simplicity and clarity of their vision, which had not changed from day one, and no doubt that would have appealed to us then. Most company ideas you see today are features of Cisco or Microsoft products, or business applications.”

2) Doesrepparttar 104087 Google IPO have any impact on venture investing forrepparttar 104088 next 12 months? Will it increase valuations? Does this mean there is new "hope" for exits for venture-backed companies?

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use