What Is Ayurvedic Medicine

Written by Swami Sadashiva Tirtha


According to a new survey carried out by Alliance & where ID_NUM=9270; Leicester, one in five small business owners view tax as their greatest concern. The Chancellor has announced in his last budget that companies with profits below œ10,000 will not have to pay any corporation tax with effect from 1 April 2002. The question to be asked is: does that announcement make incorporation a more attractive option compared to being a sole trader?

The answer is that from a tax point of view, it is advantageous to trade through a limited company as long asrepparttar income is drawn fromrepparttar 115881 company byrepparttar 115882 owners as dividends from their shares andrepparttar 115883 amount of dividends drawn is restricted belowrepparttar 115884 40% band rate (i.e. œ31,063 for tax year 2002/03). That way,repparttar 115885 owners have no further personal tax ("income tax") to pay. Moreover, dividends are not subject to national insurance contributions. This is excellent news of course. But, if dividend income falls withinrepparttar 115886 higher rate bracket of income tax (i.e. above œ34,515), they will be taxed at 22.5% onrepparttar 115887 excess, which of course will increaserepparttar 115888 tax burden. The company profits are subject to corporation tax rates. Those are lower than income tax rates.

The most catastrophic scenario is whenrepparttar 115889 director takes his reward fromrepparttar 115890 company as salary. Then his/her salary is taxed at income tax rates (like a sole trader's income). That is because, unlike sole traders,repparttar 115891 tax system treats companies as separate from their owners because a company is a separate legal entity. The problem is thatrepparttar 115892 income taxes are higher than corporation tax rates. On top of that, they will be subject to employee and employer national insurance contributions, which of course increaserepparttar 115893 tax burden and render his position worse than even an unincorporated business ("sole trader"), because NIC Class 1 on payroll are higher than NIC Class 2 paid by self employed.

In contrast, a self employed person ("sole trader") is taxed at income tax rates onrepparttar 115894 profits from his business, which are added to his other sources of income. As it has already been mentioned, income tax rates are overall higher than corporation tax rates. On top of income tax, national insurance contributions class 4 are payable onrepparttar 115895 business profits within a specified band (7% on profits between œ4,615and œ30,420). National insurance contributions Class 2 are also paid by self-employed people, although those are lower than those payable by company directors on their salaries.

To illustraterepparttar 115896 above, let's take a simple example. We have a limited company and a sole trader. They both make œ60,000 profits each inrepparttar 115897 tax year 2002/03. We assume thatrepparttar 115898 company director takes a salary equal torepparttar 115899 amount of his personal allowances (untaxed income) of œ4,615 andrepparttar 115900 balance as dividends. The company will pay corporation tax at 19% equal to œ10,523 and nothing else. The sole trader will pay income tax œ16,542, National insurance Class 2 œ104 and National insurance Class 4 œ1,806. Total œ18,452. The bottom line is thatrepparttar 115901 person that has incorporated his business into a limited company will make a tax saving of œ7,929 compared to a sole trader! Isn't that fantastic?

Somebody might be wondering: why is this entire happening? The official explanation is that, this government, to helprepparttar 115902 economy grow, encourages people to leave as much profits within their businesses to be reinvested, instead of being taken out and spent.

The "unofficial line" is that, as a matter of fact, for yearsrepparttar 115903 Inland Revenue has tried to reclassifyrepparttar 115904 self-employed. The 1% in NIC hike on staff salaries aboverepparttar 115905 NIC threshold from next April adds to bothrepparttar 115906 employees' and employers' tax burden and may more than offsetrepparttar 115907 saving fromrepparttar 115908 corporation tax zero rate onrepparttar 115909 first œ10,000 of profits.

Back Pain; A New Therapy

Written by Margot B


A new non-surgical treatment for back pain has been given clinical trials at several teaching hospitals. These trials were done on people who had been referred to a neuro-surgical department because other, non-surgical, treatment had been ineffective.

This new therapy is ‘vertebral axial decompression therapy’ [VAX-D] and has been issued a new U.S. patent. VAX-D is a therapeutic table, invented by Dr. Allan Dyer, former Deputy Minister of Health, Ontario, and who isrepparttar pioneer inrepparttar 115880 heart defibrillator research.

The VAX-D table has been proven to be a reasonably effective means of decompression therapy for managing herniated and/or degenerative lumbar discs. Inrepparttar 115881 research trials,repparttar 115882 degree of significant remission of symptoms attained after 10 daily therapy sessions was 70 % - after other procedures, including physical and chiropractic treatment, had failed.

A follow-up of patients, up to 12 months, did not find any unexpected level of relapse.

VAX-D is not a cure-all for all back problems but surgery should be used for patients failing to respond to this more conservative approach.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use