Venture vs Vulture Capitalists

Written by William Cate


Venture vs. Vulture Capitalists By William Cate Published July 1999 [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/] [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/globalvillageinvestmentclubwelcome/]

Inrepparttar last issue of EFS (V3#10), my Venture Capital article reflectedrepparttar 112491 current experiences of three small Silicon Valley companies. My article generated comments from four Venture Capitalists. In essence, there are Venture Capitalists and there are Vulture Capitalists.

Venture Capitalists fund one company in every 2,500 companies that query them. Their preferred exit strategy isrepparttar 112492 private sale ofrepparttar 112493 company. They are willing to hold their equity in an investment for years. They believe that they bring management and financial skills torepparttar 112494 company that will enhancerepparttar 112495 company's probability of success. If two-of-seven investments (29%) succeed, they make money.

Vulture Capitalists fund one company in every 100 companies that query them. Their preferred exit strategy is to takerepparttar 112496 company public. They intend to recover their risk capital quickly. They bring sales skills torepparttar 112497 company. Their goal is to make money on every investment.

I've come across Vulture Capitalists offering toxic convertibles. They act as Merchant Bankers offering bridge financing. They offer secondary Private Placement financing to high flying, usually Hi-Tech public companies.

The Merchant Banking loans requirerepparttar 112498 repayment ofrepparttar 112499 loan and interest fromrepparttar 112500 underwriting. The Merchant Banker demands a large bloc of free stock for makingrepparttar 112501 loan. The Merchant Banker dumpsrepparttar 112502 stock quickly intorepparttar 112503 Market. About two years ago,repparttar 112504 SEC moved to stop this practice. Any outside party considering doing Bridge Loan financing for a bloc of stock is asking for trouble fromrepparttar 112505 SEC. Withoutrepparttar 112506 stock incentive,repparttar 112507 bridge loan is too risky. After all, only halfrepparttar 112508 IPO's are underwritten. Unless you arerepparttar 112509 underwriter, you can't be certain thatrepparttar 112510 underwriting will happen.

Who Does the SEC Serve?

Written by William Cate


Who Doesrepparttar SEC Serve? By William Cate Published May 2001 [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/] [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/globalvillageinvestmentclubwelcome/]

In 67 years,repparttar 112490 SEC hasn't found a way to protect investors from their own stupidity. I'm not sure that you can outlaw stupidity. I'm certain that it can't be done by 20,000 Government lawyers.

The SEC has createdrepparttar 112491 illusion that American stocks are credible investments. This benefitsrepparttar 112492 American brokerage community. The core ofrepparttar 112493 stock fraud problem are some of these brokerage firms. Like J. Edgar Hoover's refusal to investigaterepparttar 112494 Mob,repparttar 112495 SEC doesn't seriously investigate major brokerage firms,repparttar 112496 NASD, orrepparttar 112497 Depository Trust Company (DTC). Ifrepparttar 112498 SEC charged Michael Miliken, why weren'trepparttar 112499 owners of Drexel charged? Why isrepparttar 112500 Federal Reserve charged with investigatingrepparttar 112501 DTC? The Feds own sixty percent ofrepparttar 112502 DTC. It's like askingrepparttar 112503 fox to investigaterepparttar 112504 murder inrepparttar 112505 hen house. The Law and SEC policies usually protectrepparttar 112506 crooks on Wall Street.

The SEC's goal in ending shell sales is to stop stock promoters from defraudingrepparttar 112507 public. Their theory appears to be that increasing costs will discouragerepparttar 112508 crooks from going public. It won't work. It will only drive uprepparttar 112509 cost of raising money for honest business owners and entrepreneurs. Higher costs means more crooks inrepparttar 112510 Market and fewer real business investments. The crooks will move to spinoffs long before most honest business people realize that spinoffs arerepparttar 112511 last low cost option to going public. The SEC will pressure Congress into ending spinoffs. Unlike shells, spinoffs are protected by Section 12 ofrepparttar 112512 1934 U. S. Securities Act. Congress must changerepparttar 112513 Law to closerepparttar 112514 spinoff option. However, excluding honest business people fromrepparttar 112515 Market creates pressure on Congress to reverserepparttar 112516 SEC's regulatory policies. Eventually, Congress will liberalize listing requirements. The cycle will repeat itself. The crooks will continue to "Pump & Dump." Some brokerage firms will steal billions fromrepparttar 112517 public. The farce will continue.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use