To Witness t he L ife t hat is God.

Written by Michael Blitchtein.


My wife, our friend and I went to listen to a concert in one ofrepparttar well known Halls in Melbourne. After parking our car two elderly ladies showed us whererepparttar 114458 entrance was and we began walking toward it. Coming down from a small asphalt slope onrepparttar 114459 way we suddenly heard an alarming sound behind us, turned around and saw that one of these ladies had fallen heavily. She sustained a deep wound on her forehead and was bleeding. She wanted to see a doctor, her friend and myself helped her up. However, she became pale and could not proceed. We sat her down on some nearby stairs, and she closed her eyes, her body became seemingly lifeless, and I realized that she lost consciousness. An ambulance was called. A suggestion that came to me first was that she is slipping away. Being a student of divine Science and having a strong desire to help her,repparttar 114460 idea that God is our life came into my thought. In Science and Health with key torepparttar 114461 Scriptures by Mary Baker Eddy I learned that this statement is true of everybody. On page 425 Science and Health says: “Mortal man will be less mortal, when he learns that matter never sustained existence and can never destroy God, who is man’s Life.” Supported by these ideas I was able mentally to refuse that suggestion, vigorously saying to myself, “NO!” Based on what I knew to be true and as well torepparttar 114462 need ofrepparttar 114463 moment, I said to that lady with confidence and all my love, “God is your life!”. In a few moments, still lying onrepparttar 114464 stairs, she opened her eyes and I helped her to sit. She stared into my eyes but could not speak. Refusing to accept what material senses were telling me, I felt lead to repeat to her “God is your life!” Immediately her face changed, her eyes lit up and her life seemed to be coming back to her body. She said to me twice: “Thank you. You’ve helped me.”

Japan's Greatest Lesson: Compulsory Flu Vaccine Reveals No Benefit and Deadly Side Effects

Written by Melissa Gordon


Atrepparttar two day Medical conference entitled "Should vaccinations be compulsory or free choice?" Doctors from various areas ofrepparttar 114457 world were invited to presentrepparttar 114458 situation in their country and also to highlight problems surrounding some ofrepparttar 114459 vaccines. A pediatrician presents a copy ofrepparttar 114460 points made in Dr. Yamamoto's presentation entitled "Why Japanese Government had to cease compulsory vaccinations." (The English translation is reasonably clear.)

Influenza in Japan

Mass influenza vaccination programs for school aged children had been started in 1960, and about 3 million children were vaccinated. In 1976,repparttar 114461 compulsory vaccination system had been introduced and 17 million children from primary to high school had to be vaccinated twice annually. This was a unique vaccination program inrepparttar 114462 world, whichrepparttar 114463 government believed would avoidrepparttar 114464 social influenza epidemics. This was a wrong hypothesis which was not verified for a long time.

Sincerepparttar 114465 80srepparttar 114466 vaccination uptake was constant at about 60% every year butrepparttar 114467 incidence rate per 100,000 changed from 5 to 60 without concern torepparttar 114468 vaccination rate. Since 1989repparttar 114469 vaccination uptake decreased rapidly to 20%, butrepparttar 114470 incidence rate did not increase.

Influenza incidence rate between non-vaccinated city and neighboring vaccinated cities

City A had 25,000 school children, City B had 21,000 school children. Statistically, they wererepparttar 114471 same.

The results in 1984:

City A ceased compulsory Influenza vaccination in 1980 and less than 1% ofrepparttar 114472 city tookrepparttar 114473 Influenza vaccine. The Influenza incidence was 43%. Cities B,C and D continued compulsory vaccinations. -City B- 90% ofrepparttar 114474 city tookrepparttar 114475 Influenza vaccine. The Influenza incidence was 40%. -City C- 77% ofrepparttar 114476 city tookrepparttar 114477 Influenza vaccine. The Influenza incidence was 43%. -City D - 76% ofrepparttar 114478 city tookrepparttar 114479 Influenza Vaccine. The Influenza incidence was 52%. A similar study was documented in 1985 with similar results. It was an important epidemiologic study that led torepparttar 114480 end ofrepparttar 114481 compulsory influenza vaccination program. Adverse Reactions torepparttar 114482 Influenza Vaccine

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use