Three of President Bush's failures in his first termWritten by Mike Sylvester
President Bush’s first term is over; we can now look at what he accomplished. A President should be judged on what he promised voters during his campaign. Voters should compare what he promised, to what he delivered.Look at some of what President Bush wanted to accomplish in his first term: A better public education system, fiscal responsibility, and less Federal involvement in affairs of fifty States. Let’s look at each of these goals President Bush set for himself. President Bush increased Federal spending on education by 83%. He signed a bill called “No Child left Behind.” This bill established a set of Federal mandates to fifty states; many of which are not funded. Not one single educator I have discussed this bill with thinks it will help Indiana; in fact, all of them feel that it will hurt our school systems. With all of this extra spending and this extra layer of beauracracy what has happened to test scores of our school children? Unfortunately, they have dropped even further. I would give President Bush an “F” on education reform. He sure spent a lot of money; but, spending more money and adding another layer of administrators is not way to fix system. After being elected in 2000, President Bush promised more fiscal responsibility. He inherited a 5.6 trillion dollar deficit. The Federal deficit is now over 7.6 trillion dollars. Our Republican Congress, Republican Senate, and Republican President have increased Federal deficit by one third in four short years. The Republican Party can no longer call themselves fiscal conservatives. Our Federal deficit is so high that our currency has sunk to new lows against foreign currency. The main reason for plunge of dollar is foreign investors are concerned about massive debt that our government is incurring. There is no doubt that President Bush receives an “F” for fiscal responsibility. Our children and grand children will regret spending excesses of our generation.
| | Why Democrats Lose Elections: They aren't dumb. They're asleep. Written by Kenn Gividen
Give GOP credit. Unlike Democrats — whose collective IQ seems to register somewhere between a ’58 Buick and box of rocks — Republicans are astutely aware of their political surroundings. That’s why they win and Democrats don’t.In reality, Democrats aren’t dumb. Anyone who was privileged to bask in presence of former Gov. Joe Kernan know him as a passionate leader who truly cared for Hoosiers. The sharp mind of former Democratic Party State Chair Kip Tew was an asset to party. And former Lt. Kathy Gov. Davis was bright, witty, and personable. In short, they were a class act. No, Democrats aren’t dumb. They’re asleep. The GOP, by contrast, paid close attention to elections in 2003 when Libertarian Greg Dixon took nearly 15 percent of vote in his bid for Indianapolis City Council. That put a sizeable ding in confidence of his Republican challenger. More bothersome was fact that Libertarians proved they could plan and execute an effective campaign. The GOP took note. The Democrats snoozed. That same year Libertarians’ candidate for mayor in Carmel snatched nearly 25 percent of vote from Republican incumbent. That was no small task, considering Hamilton County is a bastion of Republicanism. In nearby Noblesville, GOP saw over 40 percent of its vote go to Libertarians in two of their City Council races. In Wayne County, Susan Bell flat out squashed her Republican opponent and became Hoosier state’s first Libertarian judge. All told, twelve Libertarians are holding office across state. To ears of Republicans, above has ring of an alarm clock. To Democrats it’s a lullaby. Simply said, GOP gets it. Indiana has three political parties. They are vulnerable. In 2004 they responded accordingly and won. The Democrats don’t get it. One would think party of Birch Bayh would have good sense to exploit Republicans' soft spot. Exploit it? They don’t even seem to know it exists. Consider, for example, GOP’s gubernatorial primary in May of 2004. Eric Miller, a pro-life, sun-tanned poster child for religious right, challenged man who would ultimately become next governor. The Republican Party was divided. To thinking folks, that translated into vulnerability. To Democrats — who are not thinking folks — it meant nothing.
|
