This time, they've gone too far

Written by Dianne James

June 23rd,repparttar Supreme Court crossedrepparttar 145708 line.

An Associated Press story headline read: "The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that local governments may seize people’s homes and businesses — even against their will — for private economic development." Please read this, because this decision will set a precedent to usurpe your rights as a property owner. In my opinion, this is completely unconstitutional. I urge you to write to all your lawmakers (links provided atrepparttar 145709 bottom of this page) to express your dismay at this shocking infringement onrepparttar 145710 American people's rights to own and control their own property. Readrepparttar 145711 original amendments below, and please write to your legislators about this. A Supreme Court decision should be based onrepparttar 145712 law, on constitutional rights, and common sense. This one was not. Amendment IV - Search and seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791. The right ofrepparttar 145713 people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describingrepparttar 145714 place to be searched, andrepparttar 145715 persons or things to be seized.

Amendment XIV - Citizenship rights. Ratified 7/9/1868. 1. All persons born or naturalized inrepparttar 145716 United States, and subject torepparttar 145717 jurisdiction thereof, are citizens ofrepparttar 145718 United States and ofrepparttar 145719 State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridgerepparttar 145720 privileges or immunities of citizens ofrepparttar 145721 United States; nor shall any State deprive [Deprive: deprive v. 1. To take something away from; divest. 2. To keep fromrepparttar 145722 possession of something] any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process [Property may be taken byrepparttar 145723 government only for public purposes ] of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdictionrepparttar 145724 equal protection ofrepparttar 145725 laws.


Written by Doug Krieger


Syria has become a priority target of US/Israeli preemption inrepparttar War on Terrorism. The recent Mosul homicide bomber only validatesrepparttar 145689 Syrian connection, as far as US military strategists are concerned. Our last blog highlighted how neocon policy makers and think tanks (both in America and in Israel) have sought to “deterrorize”repparttar 145690 region.

The effort at Mideast reconfiguration onrepparttar 145691 part of these strategists has been to defang Saddam Hussein first, thereby encircling Syria; and from thence, to neutralize Iran. Although Israelis have broughtrepparttar 145692 Hashemite monarchy intorepparttar 145693 equation (i.e., as a “tribal strategy” after Saddam’s demise for Iraq), that particular “gift to Jordan” may not be necessary, givenrepparttar 145694 fact that a “working democracy” is all that matters in Iraq in any event—notwithstanding Osama’s calls for Iraqis to boycottrepparttar 145695 January 2005 elections.

How Syria’s overthrow can be justified by these policy makers was repeatedly demonstrated inrepparttar 145696 last article; so now, as promised, we will discussrepparttar 145697 Biblical ramifications ofrepparttar 145698 equation—and this isrepparttar 145699 part thatrepparttar 145700 Left just loves to hate (whereas they most likely enjoyed our initial “secular analysis”); but, we’re not out to please eitherrepparttar 145701 Left norrepparttar 145702 Right—we’ll settle forrepparttar 145703 ABSOLUTE TRUTH (don’t you just love that expression—it sounds so final and almost pompous; don’t mean it to be that way, but if you want to take it that way, be our guest).


While taking our excursion downrepparttar 145704 Road to Damascus, we encountered a most troubling and confusing theological phenomenon known as “Augustinian Malaise”—a not so subtle immune deficiency disorder afflicting bothrepparttar 145705 Liberal wing ofrepparttar 145706 Church (throughoutrepparttar 145707 world), as well as Evangelical Dominionists who are “theologically allied” with their Liberal foes. Both wish to reformrepparttar 145708 current governmental social order—whether they wish to admit it or not. At leastrepparttar 145709 Evangelical Dominionists (THIS IS AN EXCELLENT SITE) admit it; whilst their erstwhile liberal allies, who abhor anything that bespeaks of inerrancy, denounce their theologically allied Dominionist “compatriots.”

These Liberal foes have no theological idea to whom they are theologically united—instead they abhorrepparttar 145710 barbaric fundamentalists who ascribe to a more Biblical hermeneutical eschatology. These Scofield-Darbyites, along with their total distortions ofrepparttar 145711 real Jesus, have been (in “liberalism’s progressive dialect”) a disaster to American Christianity, whereas PROGRESSIVE and, therefore, enlightened Christian Liberalism’s embrace of Augustinian spiritualization ofrepparttar 145712 Revelation text, demonstratesrepparttar 145713 real intent ofrepparttar 145714 “prophetic Scriptures” which is far and awayrepparttar 145715 true spirit of Christianity and its gospel of love and social justice!

Cont'd on page 2 ==> © 2005
Terms of Use