The legal fiction of common-law marriage

Written by Johnette Duff


During a radio-talk show appearance, a caller told me about his unfortunate brush withrepparttar legal fiction of common-law marriage. He had been living with a woman for several weeks when he came home one evening to findrepparttar 111322 woman, his TV and assorted other property missing. He calledrepparttar 111323 police, who mistakenly informed him thatrepparttar 111324 woman was his common-law wife and so they couldn’t help him.

What qualifies as a common-law marriage? Take your pick: 1. Leaving too many clothes at your girlfriend’s house? 2. Living together six months 3. Living together seven years?

Chances are you pickedrepparttar 111325 third answer, but all three response are equally wrong. A common misconception is thatrepparttar 111326 length of cohabitation creates common-law status. This is not true.

Three elements are necessary and none relate to a time-frame. A couple must 1. Live together 2. Agree between themselves to be marriage 3. Represent themselves as married (also called “holding-out.”)

The agreement inrepparttar 111327 second element does not have to be written; it can be implied byrepparttar 111328 behavior ofrepparttar 111329 parties. Signing leases as husband and wife or filing joint income tax returns are examples ofrepparttar 111330 proof used to imply a common-law marriage.

Playtime - A Lost Art

Written by Arleen M. Kaptur


Today's world is filled with violence - from wars - to crimes committed - every day - in every country. There are bombings, explosions, and murders. Our television programs bring up subjects that are "not suitable" for children and certainly "not suitable" as entertainment for adults.

Butrepparttar world today has taken this violence one step further - they have incorporated it in a child's playthings. The "shoot 'em up, blow 'em up" mentality has permeated evenrepparttar 111321 toy aisles in every city.

While being vigilant or "street smart" is, of course, a major concern for parents of children,repparttar 111322 old adage of "What came first -repparttar 111323 chicken orrepparttar 111324 egg" seems to emerge. Wasrepparttar 111325 idea of these recent violent crimes always out there - inrepparttar 111326 reality world - or was it nurtured and fed by violent TV, movies and now toys?

When is child is placed in a situation of making a choice when angry with another child, does he/she makerepparttar 111327 decision based on knowing that he/she can't make them disappear into cyberspace by using a laser gun, jumping over tall buildings and disappearing, or eradicating them by all sorts of other means? It seems to be getting harder and harder as toys portray violence from cars turning into robots or bugs, viscious looking creatures that permeate a person's worse nightmares, and now are sold for $29.99, packed in cellopane, and ready for a child to create their own "nightmare." As parents,repparttar 111328 responsibility of helping a child grow into maturity with a "right" sense of preservation and protection for person and property seems to be swaying torepparttar 111329 side with help from "ad" agencies and toy manufacturers.

Toys - meant to be an extension of a child's imaginative world - one of finding out what things are made of, and how they can be used - should not be filled with violence that solves all problems and leavesrepparttar 111330 "hero" surrounded by smoldering buildings and disintegrated opponents. Yes,repparttar 111331 world is a violent place at times - but that should berepparttar 111332 adults' responsibility to cope and deal withrepparttar 111333 circumstances. Our children can be made aware of certain dangers as their age allows themrepparttar 111334 maturity to understand, but why heap on violence and destruction during their recreational times as well.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use