Movie and record producers alike are saying file-sharing networks that permit its users
ability to make copies from other network member’s computers are infringing on copyright laws and costing billions of dollars in lost revenue.The recording industry claims to have lost 25% of it’s revenues since computer, so called thieves, have been using peer-to-peer file-sharing networks to obtain free music downloads.
The two latest file-sharing companies to be targeted by these copyright lawsuits are Grokster Ltd, known for its Grokster file-sharing software and StreamCast Networks Inc. from which Morpheus free music downloading software is distributed.
Unlike Napster, Grokster and Morpheus put a spin on popular file-sharing phenomenon. Instead of indexing shared files like Napster did, these file-sharing products enables it’s network members to build their own indexes – thus allowing others within network to download free music and movie files.
While some musicians are protesting they are being cheated by these illegal free music downloads – others are speaking out backing how music, movies, pictures and copy are being shared over Internet.
Some music lovers actually use file-sharing networks to check out an artists latest release before paying up to $18 for a CD that may only have one good song on it. You still will have those that will never make a purchase and continue to take advantage of free music download networks.
Many file-sharing network users have said that using these networks is good for music industry. File-sharing can bring listeners to smaller, independent bands that they may not otherwise hear on radio or in mainstream.
With likes of Apple’s iTunes store many have turned their backs on file-sharing networks paying 99 cents per song – Apple claims to sell more than 1 millions songs everyday. Although iTunes is limited still, thus giving file sharing networks a void to fill unlimited access to music and movies that may otherwise not be able from iTunes.
