The Primary Source of Business Capital

Written by William Cate


The Primary Source of Business Capital By William Cate July 2004 [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/] [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/globalvillageinvestmentclubwelcome/]

It's OPM. Banks don't have any money. They lend OPM. Brokerage Firms rarely risk their money; they rely on OPM to traderepparttar Market. Venture Capitalists, Hedge Fund Managers, Pension Funds and Insurance Companies are constantly searching for more OPM. Governments rely upon OPM to runrepparttar 112452 country. So what's OPM? It's Other People's Money.

Understanding OPM isrepparttar 112453 Key to Raising Risk Capital

The suppliers of OPM expect to be rewarded for their money. That reward is a combination of acceptable risk and profit. Often these investors don't fully understandrepparttar 112454 Risk/Reward Ratio of their investment. To have any chance of succeeding over time, they should reduce investment proposals to a simple Risk/Reward ratio to determine their willingness to risk their money.

American Banks borrow money from their depositors and leverage it with tax dollars. The Depositors believe there is very little risk in loaning money to an American Bank and since 1934, no American bank depositor has lost their money in a bank failure, thanks torepparttar 112455 American taxpayer.

Losing Atrepparttar 112456 Bank

However, what bank depositors fail to realize is their 3% interest rate reward is inadequate to allow them to breakeven over time. They are taxed on their interest income at about 40%, thus their after tax income is about 1.8%. The current inflation rate is about 6%. Bank savings depositors are steadily losing money every year. To break even against inflation on a taxable investment requires a 10% interest rate. Thus, their Risk/Reward ratio is certain loss over time against a 0.03 annual reward. That's a Risk/Reward ratio of 100/0.03 over time. You would probably do far better in Las Vegas or Atlantic City!

Losing inrepparttar 112457 Stock Markets

Brokerage Firm clients supplyrepparttar 112458 money (OPM) to playrepparttar 112459 Stock Market. The public company failure rate onrepparttar 112460 volatile end (Over-the-Counter and Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board) ofrepparttar 112461 U.S. Public Market is over 98%. To breakeven,repparttar 112462 client needs to sell their stock at a share price 98 times their investment. And that figure doesn't factor in taxes and inflation. It's rare that shareholders sell whenrepparttar 112463 share price doubles. Thus, their Risk/Reward ratio is 98% odds of loss over time against a twofold potential reward. The Risk/Reward ration is about 98/2.

Atrepparttar 112464 conservative end ofrepparttar 112465 U.S. stock market (the New York Stock Exchange), most share prices have traded within a narrow range of about 20%, forrepparttar 112466 past couple of years. Thus,repparttar 112467 OPM investor's Risk/Reward ratio is even overrepparttar 112468 past few years against a 0.02 reward. The shareholders reward isn't justified byrepparttar 112469 fact thatrepparttar 112470 inflation rate is 6% and capital gains taxes of 23%. The Risk/Reward ratio is about 1/0.005

Why Most Venture Capitalists Fail

Venture Capitalists speculate with OPM. They wrongly believe that out of seven very high-risk investments, they will make money if two speculations are profitable, three financings breakeven and three speculations are losers. They fail to understandrepparttar 112471 odds against them, when only one startup company in one hundred will succeed. The odds are strongly against their making a consistent profit. So assuming a fivefold return on their two winners, their Risk/Reward ratio is 99% loss over time against a 1.43 potential reward. The Risk/Reward ration is 99/1.43. My proof of this is that any comparative review of American Venture Capital Directories shows that there is a steady attrition of these firms over time. Venture Capitalists regularly lose money becauserepparttar 112472 Risk/Reward ratio is strongly against them. They are failing to dorepparttar 112473 simplest arithmetic which should berepparttar 112474 cornerstone of their investing philosophy. I can assure you that it isrepparttar 112475 cornerstone of Beowulf Investments.

Where's the Money?

Written by William Cate


Where'srepparttar Money? By William Cate July 2004 [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/] [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/globalvillageinvestmentclubwelcome/]

To create a US$100 million Multinational Corporation will take US$100 million. So, your question should be: where isrepparttar 112451 money coming from to make my VCP proposal work?

The Beowulf Investments' PIPES

As a first step, my firm, Beowulf Investments (BI), will invest US$1,300,000 to create your client's US$5,000,000 company. As I've outlined in my Primary Source of Business Capital article, BI recover its risk capital within sixty days. (Once done, we are willing to waitrepparttar 112452 necessary years to achieve our profits, along with your company insiders.) To do so, BI must sell some of its shares torepparttar 112453 public. The resulting increased float createsrepparttar 112454 imperative to buryrepparttar 112455 shares and reducerepparttar 112456 effective float, as discussed in my article, Buryingrepparttar 112457 Stock.

In theory, Beowulf Investments could recyclerepparttar 112458 same US$1,300,000, or any amount of money, into any client company without incurring a long-term risk. However, this isn't in anyone's best interests.

Our goal is to supplyrepparttar 112459 money to startrepparttar 112460 M&A process. We strongly believe that a public company M&A strategy will createrepparttar 112461 money needed forrepparttar 112462 company to grow. (Inrepparttar 112463 past four years, Cisco Systems, for instance, even with some major errors, turned their company into a current $147B giant using this process. I can hardly argue with such a gargantual success. So what we're doing here is not reinventingrepparttar 112464 wheel.)

Inrepparttar 112465 first year or two, it is possible forrepparttar 112466 Client Company to have access to a key acquisition, without havingrepparttar 112467 cash to buy it. In that case, Beowulf Investments will supply that cash.

Our Clients are Printing Their Own Money

Stock is money. It's a paper currency like all paper currencies. Most public companies print far too many shares and sufferrepparttar 112468 inevitable consequences of seeing their currency collapse.

Used as money, our pubic company client's shares will supply 75% ofrepparttar 112469 cash they need to create a hundred million-dollar company.

Our public company client can buy private cash-producing assets, using its shares. These shares will hold a constant exchange rate value withrepparttar 112470 U.S. Dollar. The owners ofrepparttar 112471 private, cash-producing company, acquired by our public company as it grows to being a twenty million dollar company, will have sold for far more to our public company client than they could have sold to another local private buyer.

The reason for that is thatrepparttar 112472 2-for-1 stock split will giverepparttar 112473 original owners nearly double their firm's actual value due torepparttar 112474 split. For example, our public company client will use US$1 million of Beowulf Investments' money and US$3 million of their shares valued at US$20/share. Thusrepparttar 112475 acquired company will own 150,000 shares of our public company client. Withrepparttar 112476 2-for-1 split, they will own 300,000 shares valued at US$20/share and worth US$6,000,000. Our public company client has effectively paid these private company sellers, US$3,000,000 more than their private companies were worth.

The private company sellers MUST Pool and Vault their shares until our client's public company is sold at Market Capitalization. Thus,repparttar 112477 acquisition for shares will not cost our public company client excessive cash to maintaining its strong share price.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use