The Possibilities for Anarchy (II)

Written by Angelique van Engelen

Any chances for a country to be ruled by alternative rule will always be zero because -as many economists, philosophers and scientists claim-repparttar wayrepparttar 136200 various parts reality consist of interrelate is dominated by forces we won’t in a billion years have any chance of controling. An anarchist with aspirations to help build organizational structures not based on governing from above’s best bet is to get a clear picture of those areas of science that are leadingrepparttar 136201 way in terms of future progress.

In setting out to get any broad idea of what's driving our society’s progress,repparttar 136202 sciences open up a plethora of ideas for alternative ways governing reality. It is simply surprising what limited bearings these abundant ideas have on real life governments, business and any organised part of public life, givenrepparttar 136203 fact that many of them have been around for so long.

Talk ofrepparttar 136204 anarchization of structures that govern us is not new, yet it’s likely that we’ve become immune to it. To think anarchy has so far always boiled down to getting a pretty close idea of existing governing principles more than what they can be replaced with. Our tolerance levels for more general new ideas have also risen a lot due torepparttar 136205 rise of technology. So much so that we hardly are knocked over if someone supposes that doing away with governments altogether might suit us even better thanrepparttar 136206 adoption of another procedure based on true science.

Neither are alternative theories very much seen as subversive. Anyone with a subversive streak simply has to start shouting or display odd behavior and will still likely fail to be recognized as such. Even though naturally we sidestep systems that do not testify of authority from above as having any chance of being implemented, so long as you don't packagerepparttar 136207 subject with blatant “anti establishment’ labels, you have equal chances of getting as good a hearing asrepparttar 136208 man who's proposingrepparttar 136209 next major overhaul ofrepparttar 136210 national health system or so.

So in this sense,repparttar 136211 anarchy project is really rather simple. Compile ideas at random and start preaching them. Yetrepparttar 136212 fact that none of us can imagine what a country is going to look like that's done away with government (history kindly doesn’t provide us with precedents) combined withrepparttar 136213 fact that organising this is a real possibility is somehow again highly indicative again ofrepparttar 136214 state of play inrepparttar 136215 developed world. It'srepparttar 136216 anomaly ofrepparttar 136217 ‘Third World vs Developed World’ type. Poverty can't be simply reasoned away. We know that. But we’re less sure about subversives. Why? Because we don’t know at which levels they are active.

The shift inrepparttar 136218 debate fromrepparttar 136219 real and tangible to a higher, almost metaphysical level, is something that many old time revolutionaries objected to but which modern anarchists simply take into their stride. The abstractization of reality somehow is objectionable when it comes to real life threatening situations like poverty in Africa and terrorist strikes on our cities, yet most anarchists, likerepparttar 136220 mainstream, seerepparttar 136221 fact that terrorists have forced us to take this portion of reality at face value not as a reason to abandon this domaine. To do so would be to abandon all options to make a difference, it is argued.

Political realities no longer are dialectical, but rather a viral ooze, infecting language and thought. The search for alternative ways governing reality is underway full swing and it it’s taking place without our knowledge in governments, business and any organised part of public life. Depending on one’s take onrepparttar 136222 subject, it is not so muchrepparttar 136223 viability of chance that any given country will by choice adopt a system based on anarchy that is sought, butrepparttar 136224 ideas surrounding this. Man’s ultimate strife is to master nature in a fully free and autonomous way. To gain any insight of where alternative ideas have a chance to find a solid base on par withrepparttar 136225 ideas that are currently employed by governments, one simply needs to take a look at what’srepparttar 136226 hottest topic inrepparttar 136227 philosophy of science. The arguments here likely shed most light on how we are likely to think aboutrepparttar 136228 future in coming years. The talk inrepparttar 136229 philosophy of science is yielding an overwhelming plethora range of ideas for our argument and almost serves as a microcosm forrepparttar 136230 rest ofrepparttar 136231 world. Number one; we haven’t had by far enough time to find decisive answers as to whether there’ll ever be a theory that conclusively decides whether reality is deterministic - ie ruled by logic. This argument was hot when nano technology sprang torepparttar 136232 fore a few years ago and carved out a whole new dimension, makingrepparttar 136233 epistemology of determinism an even thornier and more multi-faceted issue.

The Possibilities for Anarchy (I)

Written by Angelique van Engelen

When organising a country or a group of people in need of structuring, people tend to automatically sidestep ideologies that do not take authority imposed from above for granted.

Anarchists and other proponents of alternative rule almost by definition are seen as destructive elements in a society. Yet old time and modern thinkers onrepparttar subject might have some viable and decent ideas for future state organisation.

The unwieldy mess calledrepparttar 136199 internet gives rise to many new thoughts and also causes many people to revisit older ideals andrepparttar 136200 alternative scene is resultantly more vibrant than ever. Its frequent intersection withrepparttar 136201 mainstream only adds torepparttar 136202 clout of its substance. Going about researchingrepparttar 136203 possibilities for anarchy as a viable alternative to a current system of government ought to be as chaotic as we can make it if we want to keep in line withrepparttar 136204 subject's concept. But we need to keep in mind that whilst we're digging,repparttar 136205 results are streamlined by algorithms.

Surfingrepparttar 136206 web and drawing 'chaotically' fromrepparttar 136207 input of various disciplines on anarchy throws off quite interesting results. Taking anarchy at face value, you realise soon your hunch as to why it has such a negative connotation is right. To be fair, situations in which anarchy gets bad press, are almost invariably justified. Not only do anarchists rear often ugly heads when they have issues with incumbent governments that tie them together as an impromptu group of people for short stretches of times only, with a negative spirit as a combining agent, seemingly too weak to justifyrepparttar 136208 action. They often continue to destroy forrepparttar 136209 sake of destruction only.

Anarchy and regime change go hand in hand. Most ofrepparttar 136210 times that anarchists are seen 'live' in action, they are -true torepparttar 136211 nature of their political inclination- not organised in any way and they generally serve only to achieve short term goals before they go back to their ordinary lives. Anarchists can have very justified opinions, but in many cases their action is nevertheless condemned byrepparttar 136212 majority of fellow country men in favor of a new organised government.

The situation in Kyrgyzstan duringrepparttar 136213 onset ofrepparttar 136214 American invasion most recently broughtrepparttar 136215 topic to bear for renewed analysis and prior to that,repparttar 136216 Iraq invasion by American troops yielded fresh material for students of international law to break their heads over in years to come.

Due torepparttar 136217 rather short term nature of anarchy when it is a 'live' concept, there is a lot of obscurity around how systems based on no rule or anarchy would be able to function in a positive way. There is no area or country inrepparttar 136218 world that has seen a situation of anarchy through for more than a decade by choice. Yet this does not mean thatrepparttar 136219 concept is not pondered by more selfrespecting scholars of all disciplines. A quick browse onrepparttar 136220 internet reveals tons of information.

The concepts that would create true anarchic systems as mature alternatives for governments are somewhat more decent than you would hope or expect, depending on your notion of adventure or distaste for your current government. By definition, anarchists oppose merely government, not order or society. "Liberty isrepparttar 136221 Mother, notrepparttar 136222 Daughter of Order" wrote Proudhon, and most self respecting thinkers pondering anarchic ideals agree. Kropotkin, put it, "No destruction ofrepparttar 136223 existing order is possible, if atrepparttar 136224 time ofrepparttar 136225 overthrow, or ofrepparttar 136226 struggle leading torepparttar 136227 overthrow,repparttar 136228 idea of what is to takerepparttar 136229 place of what is to be destroyed is not always present inrepparttar 136230 mind. Evenrepparttar 136231 theoretical criticism ofrepparttar 136232 existing conditions is impossible, unlessrepparttar 136233 critic has in mind a more or less distinct picture of what he would have in place ofrepparttar 136234 existing state. Consciously or unconsciously,repparttar 136235 ideal,repparttar 136236 conception of something better is forming inrepparttar 136237 mind of everyone who criticizes social institutions."

Cont'd on page 2 ==> © 2005
Terms of Use