In many ways, good leadership is hard to define. It can't be directly measured. There's no leadership "score" or report card. In fact often
measure of leadership is qualitative rather than quantitative - although quantitative results always follow. So,
questions remains, how can you tell if your leadership skills are effective?Plain and simple, leadership is about getting others to take action. If leadership effectiveness is lacking, less than best effort is put forth. The better
leadership,
better
effort. Exceptional leadership inspires
best effort in others.
Effective leadership is a function of both individual competencies and organizational culture. What are some signs that leadership isn’t as effective as it could be? There are a number of them. They are indications that something is missing in
leadership equation.
* Inability to Motivate People * Difficulty Attracting/Retaining
Right People * Low Productivity * Poor Customer Orientation * High Stress * Isolation * Declining Profits * Ineffective Delegation * Lack of Creativity * Lack of Initiative * Ineffective Teams * Poor Communications * Lack of Vision * Diminishing Revenues * High Turnover
What can be done to improve leadership effectiveness? The answer is simple to understand and yet not so simple to implement. It starts with understanding
foundations of what makes someone an effective leader and what kind of organizational culture is most effective.
Effective Personal Leadership
When I ask workshop participants about characteristics of both good and bad leaders,
list never includes issues of intelligence, technical skills, or effective decision-making! Instead,
list is full of people-related traits – good listener, respectful, good communicator, develops others, …
Effective personal leadership can be summarized as being competent in these skill sets:
* Becoming Influential * Facilitating Teamwork & Collaboration * Being a Catalyst for Change * Managing Conflict * Developing Others * Having & Communicating a Compelling Vision
Unfortunately, improving one’s competency in these areas is often a challenge. Let me explain why… Unlike factual information, which gets processed in
neo-cortex of
brain, people-related skills are processed in part of
brain called
amygdala. This portion of
brain regulates emotional insights and responses rather than logical insights and responses. Improving
leadership skills set forth above require one to break old habits/responses and form new ones, and we aren’t able to do this simply by learning and acquiring knowledge. That’s
difference between
neo-cortex and
amygdala.