Superultramodern Science (SS) and The Millennium Problems in MathematicsWritten by Dr Kedar Joshi PBSSI MRI
In this article I address 3 of 7 millennium problems in mathematics announced by Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI), USA. I propose solutions (not all of which are meant to be conclusive) to problems using ideas in Superultramodern Science (SS), which is my foremost creation. (The remaining 4 problems seem to be outside scope of SS.) It is of utmost importance to note that nature of ideas and consequently of solutions is very radical and it would take painstaking efforts to fully understand and appreciate solutions proposed. Also it has to be considered that according to Conmathematics (Conceptual Mathematics) : superultramdoern mathematical science, superultramodern scientific solutions to problems are, though apparently philosophical, in fact, mathematical. Virtually all of 3 problems are such that they demand revolutionary changes in current (modern/ultramodern) sciences. And SS is thought to be an appropriate change. I shall state problems exactly as they are stated on website of CMI. However, statements are ones which are brief and not ones that are official and descriptive. This choice is out of revolutionary nature of solutions which makes it senseless to consider conventional or orthodox symbolic patterns which essentially make (official) statements look complicated and descriptive.
1. Yang - Mills Theory The laws of quantum physics stand to world of elementary particles in way that Newton's laws of classical mechanics stand to macroscopic world. Almost half a century ago, Yang and Mills introduced a remarkable new framework to describe elementary particles using structures that also occur in geometry. Quantum Yang-Mills theory is now foundation of most of elementary particle theory, and its predictions have been tested at many experimental laboratories, but its mathematical foundation is still unclear. The successful use of Yang-Mills theory to describe strong interactions of elementary particles depends on a subtle quantum mechanical property called "mass gap:" quantum particles have positive masses, even though classical waves travel at speed of light. This property has been discovered by physicists from experiment and confirmed by computer simulations, but it still has not been understood from a theoretical point of view. Progress in establishing existence of Yang-Mills theory and a mass gap and will require introduction of fundamental new ideas both in physics and in mathematics.
SS solution : I suppose that light, for example, is a classical wave and photon, for example, is a quantum particle. It’s an assumption in modern/ultramodern science (relativity theory) that no massive entity travels at (or above) speed of light. From Superultramodern Scientific perspective [in particular, NSTP (Non - Spatial Thinking Process) theoretical perspective] space is a form of illusion, mass is bulk or quantity of matter, wave and particle are two conceptually distinct entities existing in form of non-spatial states of consciousness/feelings. To sum up, wave -particle behaviour is an orderly governed illusion where massive quantum particles do not really travel in space but are presented at time of wave collapse.
Disproves God...Written by Terry Dashner
Terry Dashner………………Faith Fellowship Church PO Box 1586 Broken Arrow, OK 74013
Can scientific discovery disprove God? If that question seems awkward, let me state it like this: Does science prove God’s existence? If science can, then scientific discovery is higher, superior to God. Or in words of 19th century philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche, “God is dead…” and since He is dead, live like it. Everything goes.
Before I get carried away in thought, let me make this thesis statement. The purpose of scientific discovery is not to prove or disprove God, but to expand knowledge. St Thomas Aquinas, most brilliant man to live between time of Aristotle and Descartes, talked about reason and faith. One does not contradict other because both are from God. Not only is Christ beginning and end of our faith, but Bible declares that “every good and perfect gift” comes from God. Knowledge is good; therefore it comes from God. Human reason can lead us far in this life, and well it should. Then again, faith can take us above all earthly knowledge into courtyards of God. When my understanding breaks down, I can always advance forward by my faith in God.
Are you hearing me? One of my favorite authors, and I have many, is Peter Kreeft. He is an intelligent philosopher who teaches philosophy at Boston College, I believe. He writes wonderful books about philosophy and faith and I buy everyone of them. (Some of them I read often.) Peter, in his book entitled, Your Questions God’s Answers, writes following words of interest. “But do not let yourself be intimidated by atheists who claim that science disproves God. That is like claiming that studying Shakespeare’s plays disproves Shakespeare. If there were no God, there would be no science, because there would be no world for science to know.