"Skin Beauty... Do Antiaging Creams Really Turn Back the Clock?"

Written by Warren Matthews


If you believerepparttar television advertisements for skin care products, then, your answer would be a definite yes. These TV commercials suggest that if you use this or that product that you too can have a flawless and beautiful complexion and, by subtle inference be happy. But, is this reality or an illusion? It's a combination of both a partial reality and illusions. Withrepparttar 115016 majority of skin products it is definitely an illusion as most women over thirty would attest to. Many products can certainly make your skin look better atrepparttar 115017 time of application butrepparttar 115018 real test is when allrepparttar 115019 make up is washed off.

Generallyrepparttar 115020 fine lines, wrinkles, blemishes and sagging of skin still remain! Having said that, there are however a few natural products that will help with firming uprepparttar 115021 skin and reducing fine lines and blemishes but you have to accept that there are limitations to what they can do on their own. More about this later inrepparttar 115022 article! So, what isrepparttar 115023 answer... plastic surgery? Many people obviously think that it is, givenrepparttar 115024 booming cosmetic plastic surgery industry. But is it? In my opinion definitely not! I have met quite a number of people that have had plastic surgery and I have not been impressed.

I remember just a few years ago meeting up with some old friends from St Louis for dinner in Palm Beach Florida.

My friends who were in their late 70's brought along a friend who would have been in her early 60's. It was apparent that this friend had had a number of plastic surgery procedures on her face and not all of them were successful. I remember thinking atrepparttar 115025 time that she would have looked better without them. Of course that is not alwaysrepparttar 115026 case. Some people get really good results, but they are very much dependent uponrepparttar 115027 skill ofrepparttar 115028 surgeon. So,repparttar 115029 risks are high. So, what causes skin to age which results in sagging, wrinkles and blemishes?

If you want to maintain clear, healthy, and firm skin into old age you need to know this. So ... here isrepparttar 115030 brief version ... FREE RADICALS. That's it in a nutshell.

I am sure that you have heard about free radicals and you may even know exactly what they are, but nonetheless I will give you a quick briefing about them. Even though free radicals age our bodies and skin they are a natural and essential part of life. They are everywhere, inside our body and out. They are more concentrated inrepparttar 115031 cities or anywhere there is any form of environmental pollution. Sunlight also creates free radicals.

It is possible to seerepparttar 115032 effect of them quite dramatically when you cut an apple open and leave it exposed torepparttar 115033 air. The parts withoutrepparttar 115034 skin quickly go brown. This is because it is being attacked by these free radicals. If they were not there then nothing would decompose andrepparttar 115035 whole planet would be a massive garbage dump. So, what exactly are they? They are oxygen molecules that have lost an electron through interaction with other molecules. As with everything in nature an effort is made (in this caserepparttar 115036 molecule) to heal itself!

There is only one way it can do this... and that is by stealing an electron from another healthy molecule. So, it rushes around like a thief until it can find one!

When it does and it stealsrepparttar 115037 electron, what happens?

You guessed it... another free radical is created and inrepparttar 115038 process cells whererepparttar 115039 'thief' has entered are damaged. There is no 'security system' that can shut free radicals out. They surround you, they enter your body with each breath you take. The greater your intake of airrepparttar 115040 higher exposure that you have to free radicals. Ever wondered why long distance runners look older than their years, particularly their face?

Overall Risk of Cancer Cut By 37%...

Written by Warren J. Matthews


What do you think about this?

* Overall cancer risk reduced by 37% * Overall reduction in cancer mortality rates by 50% * 30% reduction of colorectal cancer.

Sounds likerepparttar sort of claims someone standing on a soapbox trying to sell snake oil would make... but SURPRISE ... these statements are coming fromrepparttar 115015 mainstream ... andrepparttar 115016 results are from simple natural multi-vitamins NOT pharmaceutical drugs!

But that is not all! It is now being said that if everyone over 65 took a multi every day thatrepparttar 115017 US taxpayer would save $1.6 billion over 5 years in Medicare costs due to a reduced incidence of coronary artery disease and other diseases triggered by weak immune systems.

These figures do NOT factor inrepparttar 115018 financial savings brought about byrepparttar 115019 reduction of colorectal cancer, diabetes, prostate cancer and a whole host of other ailments that can likely be avoided through proper nutritional supplementation. If these were factored in thenrepparttar 115020 savings would be MUCH greater. OK... who is saying these things?

Earlier this month there was a conference in Washington DC entitled "Multivitamins and Public Health: Exploringrepparttar 115021 Evidence."

Presented at this conference wererepparttar 115022 results of a study just completed byrepparttar 115023 Lewin Group (a health care consulting firm). It was funded by Wyeth Consumer Healthcare which is part of Wyeth Pharmaceutical Group. This is whatrepparttar 115024 researchers did:

They analyzed more than 125 clinical studies plus scientific literature to determine whether or not multivitamins gave any health benefits and if so, whether these benefits translated into savings in healthcare bills for people 65 years of age or older.

The director ofrepparttar 115025 Lewin Group, Allen Dobson, PhD putrepparttar 115026 study results into perspective when he said, "finding any cost savings for preventative measures is unusual and finding cost savings of this magnitude ($1.6B) is very rare."

It is a refreshing turn around for someone associated with 'mainstream' medicine to actually concede that preventive measures actually do work. As you have probably noticed overrepparttar 115027 last couple of years there have been many misleading statements from spokespeople inrepparttar 115028 'mainstream' medical field doing their best to discourage people fromrepparttar 115029 use of natural preventive remedies.

More positive 'mainstream' comments...

The positive 'mainstream' comment doesn't end with this study! Duringrepparttar 115030 same week thatrepparttar 115031 conference in Washington was heldrepparttar 115032 results of another study was published inrepparttar 115033 American Journal of Epidermiology which is a 'mainstream' publication. This was a study carried out by Harvard duringrepparttar 115034 last twenty years.

The results will no doubt annoy many opponents of natural preventive medicines butrepparttar 115035 facts speak for themselves. Here arerepparttar 115036 highlights:

* The study involved approximately 145,000 middle aged or elderly adults. * In 1982 these adults were surveyed regarding their multi-vitamin use. * Their use was reassessed 10 years later in 1992. * They were then followed up again overrepparttar 115037 next five years. * During that period 797 ofrepparttar 115038 participants developed colorectal cancer.

Whatrepparttar 115039 researchers found is that after adjusting for 'health conscious' behaviors those participants that had regularly used multi vitamins sincerepparttar 115040 start ofrepparttar 115041 study (at least 10 years) had a 30% decreased risk of developing colon/rectal cancer.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use