by Francisco AloyBeing a relative newcomer to
Web I decided to foray into Search Engine Optimization to gain first hand experience and any insights I could. My assumption was that it would have a basis built on rational thinking and logical facts.
I pre-supposed a certain degree of agreement and transparency from many of
established sources and opinion makers. My starting viewpoint supported by my association of Search Engine Optimization and
Web as natural extensions of common sense, logical thinking.
In hindsight, I must confess I'm not more knowledgeable about
subject than when I first started. I found very few opinions and practices based on fact. What I did find - and it came as an unexpected revelation - was general confusion and disagreement.
I found secret potion SEO, lurking-in-the-shadows SEO, ignorance as dogma SEO, Voodoo SEO, witch doctor SEO, magical chicken bones SEO,
10 blind men and
elephant SEO, fancy and hearsay as SEO! In
minority, I found but a handful of opinions based on cold hard facts and logic. How in
world can Search Engine Optimization mean all those things?
OK, perhaps I did overdo
above paragraph, but
point I'm making is this: With
infinite number of opinions, incorrect assumptions and dead wrong practices; how do you know what to believe? Imagine you're a small business looking for SE optimization; how would you go about it?
The Search Engines, of course, won't reveal more than general guidelines for optimization; other than that, they don't say much. I realize they do things in that manner because they can't explain much about their inner workings. If folks had
skinny on
formulas and algorithms, nothing short of SE pandemonium would ensue.
I'm sure you've seen
ads that guarantee a dominant position for your choice of keywords. How can that be so? I think some keyword phrases are so competitive, very few have
resources it would take to acquire dominance. The cost of many of
keywords and phrases are completely out of reach for most small home based businesses.