William Jennings Bryan said: "Christians desire that their children shall be taught all
sciences, but they do not want them to lose sight of
Rock of Ages while they study
age of rocks." It may seem incredible to those who do not know that
Churchians created
Devil as a means of keeping their flock in fear - who also think
Devil is a Pagan concept. The fear of death was not a Keltic concept and they weren't moved to assign all their wealth to some rich church when they approached death in order to avoid joining
Devil. Some Christian fundamentalists sell
idea that
age of rocks was a way that
Devil sought to lead Christians astray and these same people would have you teach your children
"Rock of Ages" has more veracity than
geology that proves we've had a long time on this earth to develop and learn what kind of Divine soul we are blessed with.
ASIATIC LAWS OF UNIVERSALITY IN THE 'STUPAS':
In other books I have explored
Dolmen and Round Towers of
ancient megalith Builders which resemble
symbolism of Man as represented in
steeple. They are part of
era after
truly great megaliths were built in places like Stonehenge and Poverty Point. The real meaning behind
form and structure may be similar though. Mircae Eliade was one of
Eranos Conference attendees with Jung and Campbell who I draw much insight from, in my studies. His scholarship is open and elucidative for me and I sincerely hope
reader will enjoy taking a journey with him to Barabudur. It is not easy for those of us in
present intellect-focused or faith oriented theology to integrate all aspects of how we might learn. Perhaps a simple suggestion to leave all preconceptions aside will suffice. So take off your 'thinking caps' and put your heart and soul on
front burner while
rose-coloured glasses of ego or faith diminish into
distance.
"On
subject of Barabudur,
famous temple on
island of Java and
most beautiful monument in Asia, whole libraries have been written. Purely technical explanations have been attempted taking account only of
laws of architecture; endless controversies have been joined over
religious and magical meanings hidden in that colossal monument. Dutch Orientalists and architects have published over
past fifteen years books of great value on Barabudur. The names of Krom, Van Erp, and Stutterheim must be mentioned. The last of these, in a work of 1927, laid
foundation for a true interpretation of
temple: 'Barabudur is nothing less than a symbolic representation of
Universe'. From this intuition Paul Mus's investigations start. The beginning of his book consists of a history of
controversy, an exposition of
principle hypotheses, and a critique of methods. Examined in turn are theories of
most illustrious India specialists, art historians and architects. Then Mus undertakes to discuss
problem. It must be remembered that this gigantic volume is preceded by an 'avant-propos' of 302 pages in which
author establishes
validity of his methodology. In order to justify
symbolic function of
Javanese temple, Mus emphasizes a truth often remarked by Orientalists: that if
Buddha was not represented iconographically for several centuries, it was not due to incapability on
part of Indian artists, but to
fact that a type of representation superior to images was essayed. 'That would not have been a defeat of plastic art, but rather
triumph of a magical art.' When an iconography of
Buddha was adopted,
symbolism was poor by comparison. The 'aniconic symbol' of Enlightenment (the wheel, etc.) was much more powerful, more 'pure', than
statue. Ananda Coomaraswamy also has published evidence for this thesis in his 'Elements of Buddhist Iconography'. (12) The conclusion to be drawn from this is that Buddhists, as well as Hindus (and Asians in general) {As well as
Sauk Indians we showed are from
area of
Great Wall and were Buddhists before
loss of magic represented by
change to graven images or iconography.} before Buddhism, used symbolism more effectively, precisely because
symbol was more comprehensive and 'Active' in
magical sense than plastic representation. If
Buddha was considered to be a god (as he was, in fact, immediately after his demise), then his magical 'presence' was preserved in anything emanating from him." (13)
A human statue or even a Gothic building representing
Temple of Solomon such as
Templars built into European cathedrals, does not convey
same representation of
'Universe' or cosmos that runs through
veins of all living things. Many ancient beliefs were aware that spirit was within minerals and plants too: we are not this attuned and it is hard for us to see
vectors and lattices of energy in all things. Those who have read
'Tao te Ching' or 'I Ching' understand a little of these energies that interact and CHANGE or grow with purpose. The 'Wheel of Life' in
Tarot is meant to capture some of this magic just as
dreams of North American Indians have been captured in
circular artistic wheels that sell in all so many souvenir stands. But it will be a long time before man again understands his exquisite interconnectiveness. We know too much to see such elegant simplicity of
spirit that is all around us. The Buddhists say 'All is Within' and
completion of
phrase is "the UNIVERSE!" I honour all myths that assist
'oneness' in respect of
creative or intelligent design that so many insist is GOD. Here is an excerpt from my book Cherokee People (will return) to consume or cogitate upon.