You see a notice from a reporter seeking examples for an article. You should:(A) Ignore it. (B) Reply immediately to say you have a good story for him/her. (C) Reply immediately with your complete story. (D) Consider
request for a few days rather than acting hastily.
For more than two years this question has been part of a quiz at my Web site, and a majority of those taking
quiz have guessed
answer was (B). Wrong. That means that most people who see a reporter's query, either through a leads service such as ProfNet or PR Leads or on a discussion list, may miss their chance for 15 minutes of fame.
A reporter's notice might look like this:
For an article for a national business magazine, I am seeking businesses that have turned less than a thousand dollars in initial investment into more than a million dollars in annual sales in less than 10 years. Respond by this Friday to areporter@reporters.net.
My quiz respondents think
thing to do is to reply simply, "I fit your criteria. Here's how to reach me..." The correct answer, though, is (C), replying with
complete story. Why?
Assume that
reporter receives a flood of replies, as usually happens. Most likely, enough of those have supplied a full, enticing and relevant story for
reporter to complete his or her research without contacting you.
Factor in
deadline, too, and you'll understand you can lose your chance for
spotlight because of
delay created by making
reporter write back, "Tell me more" and wait for your reply.