"Pop-up Windows! Do You Really NEED Them?"

Written by John Evans


"Pop-up Windows! Do You Really NEED Them?" copyright2001-02 John Evans

I don't know about you, but those things really annoy me.

You knowrepparttar kind; you click on someone's web address link, and while you're waiting forrepparttar 118929 page to load, a small window pops up. They are, of course, put there to advertise something. And like as not, that 'something' may not even be related to what you came to look at in repparttar 118930 first place. Annoying? You bet.

Are you using them? And are you losing customers because of them? You just might be!

They actually weren't too bad, before, but lately they seem to be getting much worse. Used to be that you might get justrepparttar 118931 one when you first clicked onrepparttar 118932 web address link. Now, you not only get that one, but maybe another one (the same ad) when you click on a link within that web page. And then, another one when you click out of repparttar 118933 site. Where will it end?

More and more often, I have opened a web site, and IMMEDIATELY got one of those pop-ups. Not too bad. But whenrepparttar 118934 second one shows up, I hastily depart that site. You may have donerepparttar 118935 same.

"A Future So Bright - Learn From Their Mistakes!"

Written by A.T.Rendon


According to a new survey carried out by Alliance & where ID_NUM=9270; Leicester, one in five small business owners view tax as their greatest concern. The Chancellor has announced in his last budget that companies with profits below œ10,000 will not have to pay any corporation tax with effect from 1 April 2002. The question to be asked is: does that announcement make incorporation a more attractive option compared to being a sole trader?

The answer is that from a tax point of view, it is advantageous to trade through a limited company as long asrepparttar income is drawn fromrepparttar 118928 company byrepparttar 118929 owners as dividends from their shares andrepparttar 118930 amount of dividends drawn is restricted belowrepparttar 118931 40% band rate (i.e. œ31,063 for tax year 2002/03). That way,repparttar 118932 owners have no further personal tax ("income tax") to pay. Moreover, dividends are not subject to national insurance contributions. This is excellent news of course. But, if dividend income falls withinrepparttar 118933 higher rate bracket of income tax (i.e. above œ34,515), they will be taxed at 22.5% onrepparttar 118934 excess, which of course will increaserepparttar 118935 tax burden. The company profits are subject to corporation tax rates. Those are lower than income tax rates.

The most catastrophic scenario is whenrepparttar 118936 director takes his reward fromrepparttar 118937 company as salary. Then his/her salary is taxed at income tax rates (like a sole trader's income). That is because, unlike sole traders,repparttar 118938 tax system treats companies as separate from their owners because a company is a separate legal entity. The problem is thatrepparttar 118939 income taxes are higher than corporation tax rates. On top of that, they will be subject to employee and employer national insurance contributions, which of course increaserepparttar 118940 tax burden and render his position worse than even an unincorporated business ("sole trader"), because NIC Class 1 on payroll are higher than NIC Class 2 paid by self employed.

In contrast, a self employed person ("sole trader") is taxed at income tax rates onrepparttar 118941 profits from his business, which are added to his other sources of income. As it has already been mentioned, income tax rates are overall higher than corporation tax rates. On top of income tax, national insurance contributions class 4 are payable onrepparttar 118942 business profits within a specified band (7% on profits between œ4,615and œ30,420). National insurance contributions Class 2 are also paid by self-employed people, although those are lower than those payable by company directors on their salaries.

To illustraterepparttar 118943 above, let's take a simple example. We have a limited company and a sole trader. They both make œ60,000 profits each inrepparttar 118944 tax year 2002/03. We assume thatrepparttar 118945 company director takes a salary equal torepparttar 118946 amount of his personal allowances (untaxed income) of œ4,615 andrepparttar 118947 balance as dividends. The company will pay corporation tax at 19% equal to œ10,523 and nothing else. The sole trader will pay income tax œ16,542, National insurance Class 2 œ104 and National insurance Class 4 œ1,806. Total œ18,452. The bottom line is thatrepparttar 118948 person that has incorporated his business into a limited company will make a tax saving of œ7,929 compared to a sole trader! Isn't that fantastic?

Somebody might be wondering: why is this entire happening? The official explanation is that, this government, to helprepparttar 118949 economy grow, encourages people to leave as much profits within their businesses to be reinvested, instead of being taken out and spent.

The "unofficial line" is that, as a matter of fact, for yearsrepparttar 118950 Inland Revenue has tried to reclassifyrepparttar 118951 self-employed. The 1% in NIC hike on staff salaries aboverepparttar 118952 NIC threshold from next April adds to bothrepparttar 118953 employees' and employers' tax burden and may more than offsetrepparttar 118954 saving fromrepparttar 118955 corporation tax zero rate onrepparttar 118956 first œ10,000 of profits.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use