Pesticides In Food A Major Health Hazard

Written by Loring A. Windblad


Copyright 2004 by http://www.organicgreens.us and Loring Windblad. This article may be freely copied and used on other web sites only if it is copied complete with all links and text intact and unchanged except for minor improvements such as misspellings and typos. Since Rachel Carson's book, "Silent Spring", warned us in 1962 aboutrepparttar environmental dangers of modern chemicals, pesticicle use has escalated. Pesticides are chemicals that kill certain insects and microorganisms which attack plants. They benefit humankind by combating pests and helping farmers save crops from damage. But some can also damagerepparttar 114007 environment and human health.

Regulations try to limit pestlcide hazards

Pesticides may pose an environmental risk by seeping into water (and soil), may become an occupational threat to agricultural workers using them or harm humans who ingest them as they consumerepparttar 114008 food products.

Current regulations for pesticide use test their safety, evaluate and monitor their correct use. Studies determine not onlyrepparttar 114009 efficacy of a pesticide in decreasing crop damage, but examine whether it can harmrepparttar 114010 environment or human health. These regulations are re-evaluated and changed as new knowledge and experience come in.

Report stresses need to protect children from pesticides

The recently released NAS report gives an in-depth review of current pesticide regulations - their strengths and weaknesses - strongly recommending changes to safeguardrepparttar 114011 health of infants and children. Examining'data onrepparttar 114012 safety of pesticide residues inrepparttar 114013 diets of infants and children,repparttar 114014 NAS report emphasizedrepparttar 114015 fact that "because infants and children are not just little adults" current scientific and regulatory procedures must be improved to ensure that youngsters are protected from unsafe exposure torepparttar 114016 residues.

The NAS report maderepparttar 114017 following recommendations:

* Collect more complete dietary data onrepparttar 114018 foods eaten by infants and how much they eat. * Include data on non-dietary sources of pesticide exposure such as air, soil, lawns, pets and indoor surfaces. * Research ways in which adults differ from infants and children in processing pesticide residues. * Implement new methods for determining and ensuring food safety and find out who is at most risk from "above average" exposure to pesticides inrepparttar 114019 diet (and other sources).

These recommendations providerepparttar 114020 basis for changes torepparttar 114021 pesticide regulatory system which would make sure thatrepparttar 114022 food supply remains plentiful yet safe for infants and children. In summary, as pointed out by a pediatrician and professor at New York's Mount Sinai School of Medicine, "the report reveals some serious deficiencies inrepparttar 114023 current regulatory system that need to be corrected," adding that "these should not be cause for alarm."

The report also stresses that parents should continue to feed youngsters a wide variety of fruits, vegetables and juices as they are "good sources of essential vitamins and minerals." The dangers of not eating enough of these foods outweighs any possible harm from pesticide residues in food. Studies so far find pesticide residues in infant and childhood diets "well below tolerance levels set byrepparttar 114024 EPA" (Environmental Protection Agency). The American Academy of Pediatrics affirms that "there is no evidence that pesticides contribute significantly to human cancer risks," adding that "a diet rich in fruits and vegetables isrepparttar 114025 most healthful that children can consume."

Pesticide regulation in Canada

There are approximately 300 pesticide chemicals registered in Canada for use in foods. The Pest Control Products (PCP) Act and Regulations governs their sale and use in Canada. Although Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada are responsible for administering this act, three different federal departments share inrepparttar 114026 regulatory process.

Teeth Whitening - Laser Bleaching Systems And Non-Laser Bleaching Systems

Written by Matt Moncrieff


The search for more effective options inrepparttar treatment of tooth staining is nothing new. Historically speaking, there has been an ongoing interest in seeking solutions for whitening teeth. In ancient timesrepparttar 114006 Romans used Portuguese urine in an attempt to whiten their teeth! Duringrepparttar 114007 14th century, having your teeth bleached wasrepparttar 114008 most requested treatment after that of tooth extraction, and was performed throughrepparttar 114009 combining of metal files and nitric acid. Inrepparttar 114010 late 19th century a mixture of hydrogen peroxide, ether and electricity was used. Soon after, electricity was replaced by heat. Hydrochloric acid was introduced as a method of teeth whitening in 1916, and in 1966 it was used in combination with hydrogen peroxide. By 1970 it was established that hydrogen peroxide wasrepparttar 114011 most effective stain removal agent.

As most dentists know, aesthetic dentistry has become an enormous industry. The seemingly insatiable appetite of patients for better-looking whiter teeth has changed modern dentistry. And this need has been answered by dental companies in no uncertain terms. One only needs to look atrepparttar 114012 number of products available that claim to safely whiten teeth with long-lasting results and no hassles, ranging from home-bleaching kits through to in-office photochemical laser bleaching systems like Smartbleach. This then makes questions like which system isrepparttar 114013 most effective, and importantly which system can deliver predictable results, much more difficult to answer. Additionally, many bleaching systems make claims of dramatic shade improvements, backed up by glossy brochures featuring outrageously white teeth. All of which makerepparttar 114014 decision to choose a bleaching system seem harder still.

The Smartbleach concept is quite different from most other teeth whitening systems. Bleaching isrepparttar 114015 reduction of large light absorbing molecules in dental structures, into smaller molecules which are no longer in a light-absorbent state. This causes a greater level of reflection, and therefore whiter teeth. Smartbleach incorporates this concept, with research published inrepparttar 114016 Journal of Endodontics in 1988 by Loong Chün Lin, David L. Pitts and Lloyd W. Burgess. They were able to demonstrate that teeth stains caused by tetracyclines can be removed within 24 hours, solely underrepparttar 114017 influence of light. In other words, it was demonstrated that photobleaching is possible. What is important to note, however, is that only two ranges of wavelengths are able to create a photobleaching effect: UV light (290 nm and 365 nm) and green light (510 to 534 nm). Accordingly, Smartbleach incorporates a laser light (inrepparttar 114018 green range), together with hydrogen peroxide and a chemical agent (powder), to induce a photochemical reaction. These three components ensure a safe and controlled bleaching treatment with predictable results in just one hour.

The photochemical reaction inrepparttar 114019 Smartbleach procedure isrepparttar 114020 main reason it can improve all kinds of stains, including tetracycline, without any risk of heat build up inrepparttar 114021 teeth. Remember, only specific wavelengths can produce a true photochemical reaction. To create a bleaching effect with light sources of other wavelengths, heat is necessary to further breakdownrepparttar 114022 hydrogen peroxide. This wasrepparttar 114023 basis ofrepparttar 114024 Britesmile CO2 laser bleaching system. This extra heat can lead to pulp trauma and result in tooth damage. As a consequence, if a bleaching system does not have a true photochemical reaction andrepparttar 114025 light souce emits little or no heat, thenrepparttar 114026 light source has almost no effect onrepparttar 114027 bleaching result. Importantly, this point was confirmed in research conducted byrepparttar 114028 Clinical Research Associates, which showed that overrepparttar 114029 range of bleaching systems they had assessed, it made no difference oncerepparttar 114030 gels were applied torepparttar 114031 teeth, whetherrepparttar 114032 light sources were shined onrepparttar 114033 teeth or not. (CRA Newsletter August 2000: Why resin curing lights do not increase tooth whitening).

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use