Why are Napster, Gnutella and similar sharing programs so loved? For
same reason that Microsoft is so hated.Microsoft, though dealing with
most advanced technology, is imbued with
old Superior-to-Inferior philosophy, a philosophy that is still prevalent among
big corporations of our day. Napster and similar sites follow a philosophy more in harmony with today's technology and society: Peer-to-Peer philosophy.
These differing philosophies show up in company organization, management and marketing. I concentrate here on peer-to-peer marketing, which is a synonym for helpfulness marketing.
Superior-to-Inferior Philosophy
What is a boss? Someone who is superior to you.
What is a corporate hierarchy? A ladder of successive superiors.
What is a monopoly? A superior who has
last word.
The old industrial corporation conformed to a Superior-to-Inferior philosophy. It believed in
following 3 maxims:
1 - BIG IS BETTER - The bigger you are
more superior you are. And if you are on top - a CEO or chairman - you benefit handsomely. This is why corporations participate in mergers and acquisitions. This is why companies seek to be monopolies and multinational conglomerates. This is why they have mass advertising campaigns.
2 - CENTRALIZATION BRINGS CONTROL - They follow
old command and control concept used by military organizations: Superiors lay down
rules and inferiors follow them. The hierarchy is sacrosanct. You hear a lot these days about pyramidal hierarchies being squashed into flat pancakes. In big corporations this is not so. Microsoft offers an outstanding example of a penchant for control. It has developed
Ebook Reader, which exerts control over how you use an ebook you have paid for. Would you like to share this ebook with friends? This Reader makes it difficult for you to do so.
3 - BIG DADDY KNOWS BEST - Superiors have superior information. Superior corporations (big ones) have superior information that inferior corporations (small ones). The top level superior corporations (multinationals) write press releases that make
news, write articles to advance their ideas, get personalities to sell their products on radio and TV. They tell inferior consumers what is good for them and what to buy.
Superior-to-Inferior Philosophy is Dying
Times are changing. At one time
Superior-to-Inferior philosophy worked. It worked well. But it is less effective today. Eventually it will lose most of its effectiveness. There are 2 major reasons for this:
1 - RISE OF TERRORISM - The terrorist attack on September 11 brought our vulnerabilities to
forefront. Which buildings in New York were attacked? The biggest. Suddenly big is vulnerable. Now centralization is bad. Better to allow subdivisions to operate on their own. Big corporations present good targets. Merging is a dangerous activity.