Overall Risk of Cancer Cut By 37%...

Written by Warren J. Matthews


What do you think about this?

* Overall cancer risk reduced by 37% * Overall reduction in cancer mortality rates by 50% * 30% reduction of colorectal cancer.

Sounds likerepparttar sort of claims someone standing on a soapbox trying to sell snake oil would make... but SURPRISE ... these statements are coming fromrepparttar 115015 mainstream ... andrepparttar 115016 results are from simple natural multi-vitamins NOT pharmaceutical drugs!

But that is not all! It is now being said that if everyone over 65 took a multi every day thatrepparttar 115017 US taxpayer would save $1.6 billion over 5 years in Medicare costs due to a reduced incidence of coronary artery disease and other diseases triggered by weak immune systems.

These figures do NOT factor inrepparttar 115018 financial savings brought about byrepparttar 115019 reduction of colorectal cancer, diabetes, prostate cancer and a whole host of other ailments that can likely be avoided through proper nutritional supplementation. If these were factored in thenrepparttar 115020 savings would be MUCH greater. OK... who is saying these things?

Earlier this month there was a conference in Washington DC entitled "Multivitamins and Public Health: Exploringrepparttar 115021 Evidence."

Presented at this conference wererepparttar 115022 results of a study just completed byrepparttar 115023 Lewin Group (a health care consulting firm). It was funded by Wyeth Consumer Healthcare which is part of Wyeth Pharmaceutical Group. This is whatrepparttar 115024 researchers did:

They analyzed more than 125 clinical studies plus scientific literature to determine whether or not multivitamins gave any health benefits and if so, whether these benefits translated into savings in healthcare bills for people 65 years of age or older.

The director ofrepparttar 115025 Lewin Group, Allen Dobson, PhD putrepparttar 115026 study results into perspective when he said, "finding any cost savings for preventative measures is unusual and finding cost savings of this magnitude ($1.6B) is very rare."

It is a refreshing turn around for someone associated with 'mainstream' medicine to actually concede that preventive measures actually do work. As you have probably noticed overrepparttar 115027 last couple of years there have been many misleading statements from spokespeople inrepparttar 115028 'mainstream' medical field doing their best to discourage people fromrepparttar 115029 use of natural preventive remedies.

More positive 'mainstream' comments...

The positive 'mainstream' comment doesn't end with this study! Duringrepparttar 115030 same week thatrepparttar 115031 conference in Washington was heldrepparttar 115032 results of another study was published inrepparttar 115033 American Journal of Epidermiology which is a 'mainstream' publication. This was a study carried out by Harvard duringrepparttar 115034 last twenty years.

The results will no doubt annoy many opponents of natural preventive medicines butrepparttar 115035 facts speak for themselves. Here arerepparttar 115036 highlights:

* The study involved approximately 145,000 middle aged or elderly adults. * In 1982 these adults were surveyed regarding their multi-vitamin use. * Their use was reassessed 10 years later in 1992. * They were then followed up again overrepparttar 115037 next five years. * During that period 797 ofrepparttar 115038 participants developed colorectal cancer.

Whatrepparttar 115039 researchers found is that after adjusting for 'health conscious' behaviors those participants that had regularly used multi vitamins sincerepparttar 115040 start ofrepparttar 115041 study (at least 10 years) had a 30% decreased risk of developing colon/rectal cancer.

Scales are for fish, not weight loss.

Written by Dr. Jeff Banas


Contrary to common belief, your weight is not reallyrepparttar indicator of a weight problem –repparttar 115014 actual percentage of body fat isrepparttar 115015 true indicator. You need to know what percent of you is actually FAT. How are you going to monitor your weight loss if you do not know what percent of your body is fat, before you begin your program?

Let me give you an example on measuring body fat, this is important in understanding weight loss, or should I say FAT LOSS. This is actually what we are trying to lose, right? FAT!

Lets say someone weighs 200 pounds and when we measure their body fat we find out there body fat is 40%

This means that 40% ofrepparttar 115016 members body is made of fat (80 lbs). The other 120 lbs is muscle, bones, organs, water, etc. (everything but fat).

Now any true weight loss program should include some form of strength training customized to their personal abilities (Another reason you need someone who truly understandsrepparttar 115017 whole body and how it works). Because if you can gain some of that muscle mass that we lose with age, our bodies will burn more calories and therefore burn more FAT!

Now it’s a few weeks intorepparttar 115018 program and this person steps onrepparttar 115019 scale and they now weigh 198 lbs. They are a little disappointed because they thought they were doing better. Their clothes fit better, they have more energy, and they are feeling better.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use