National ID Card? Congress Approves Electronic ID CardWritten by Richard A. Chapo
Are we moving towards an Orwellian 1984 scenario in United States? Are we still truly land of free? Many are predicting severe limitations to our way of life in light of impending requirement of a national ID card.On May 10, 2005, Congress approved “Real ID Act” as part of a military spending bill. President Bush is expected to sign bill shortly. So, what’s big deal? Currently, federal government has no method for tracking citizens within United States. If you fly to Las Vegas for a week, government cannot track you without obtaining a warrant based on a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. The “Real ID Act” potentially kills advertising slogan, “What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas.” Effective May 2008, all Americans will be required to obtain federally approved ID cards containing electronically encoded personal information. The personal information will include your name, sex, address, date of birth and a digital photograph at a minimum. All of this information will be kept in a national database. Anyone without ID card will be unable to fly, open a bank account, enter federal buildings and, most likely, obtain a job. In short, we are looking at a database that allows federal government to track your every move, finances, spending activities, etc.
| | Is America Racist Still?Written by Robert Bruce Baird
This is one entry in my Heroes and Villains Volume of an encyclopedia available at World-Mysteries.com.OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES: - It was not until after Nuremberg Trials that rest of world put kinds of protections in place that had already been in place for a long time in Germany but we are found accusing Germans of heinous crimes we actually lead. It is just like Mackenzie King in Canada who was backing Hitler and his programs in many areas, along with other blue bloods like Bushes and their bosses Merovingians. Oliver Wendell Holmes is considered to be a transcendentalist like Emerson who has strong ties to Carlyle and therefore Goethe Illuminati of Weishaupt. His thoughts which are included in following quote are not as bad as they might seem and I personally think there is merit in abortion and other forms of eugenics if done for ‘Greater Good’. “Beginning in 1907, with legislation passed in Indiana, forced sterilization on basis of eugenic doctrine began spreading across United States, with finally thirty states having such laws on books. In this century, upwards of 50,000 Americans have been sterilized by order of state. {Today we have drugs that reduce libido or sex drive and potency of less fortunate and victimized masses. These drugs and lobotomies which are still performed in Canada serve same purposes.} The constitutionality of such compulsion was upheld in 1927, when case Buck vs. Bell went before Supreme Court. With only one dissent, court said, in a majority opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: ‘It is better for world, if instead of waiting to execute offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting Fallopian tubes.’ The court, in other words, went beyond saying that a person is guilty until proven innocent; it declared that hypothetical persons were presumed guilty of criminal intent even before being conceived and may not be brought into existence. The 1927 decision has never been overturned, and is still a part of law of land. After World War II, German lawyers defending those accused of being Nazi war criminals for having forcibly sterilized two million people as a part of Nazi racial doctrine pointed to sterilization laws in America and 1927 Supreme Court decision as justification for their clients' conduct. In his recent book, The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism and National Socialism, Stefan Kühl traces relationships between Nazi racial theorists and members of American eugenics movement in 1930s. American eugenicists and German advocates of "racial hygiene" were already communicating and sharing ''scientific'' information before First World War. The conflict in Europe, and particularly American entry into war against Germany, broke off all such ties. But shortly after war's end, contacts began to reemerge, with their American colleagues being especially helpful in getting German eugenicists accepted back into their community of scholars.
|
