There is a major difference between making news and “making
news.” It is
difference between a shotgun and a slingshot.Amateurs can “make
news.” They can entice a morning TV crew to take video of a charity event. Or land a mention in a local newspaper column. Or even score a feature story in a trade magazine.
But these are one-time shots that are unlikely to leave an impression on your target audience. Simply “making
news” will rarely attract a steady stream of prospects to your door.
Yet even top PR pros tend to focus on “making
news.” There are two reasons for this. First, it’s relatively easy to score. Second,
boss rarely understands that simply “making
news” is virtually worthless to
bottom line.
For example: Taco Bell “made
news” a few years ago by piggybacking on an international story. The space station SkyLab was losing its orbit and was about to crash through
earth’s atmosphere. The world press was obsessed with
possibility that
debris might strike a major city.
Taco Bell hired a boat to tow a gigantic target out onto
Pacific Ocean. If any debris hit
target, Taco Bell told
world, every American would get a free taco.
The stunt gave
news media a strong visual to associate with
more abstract story of potential space debris. It also lent a lighter side to a completely out-of-whack media obsession.
Now, I’m not criticizing Taco Bell. This was a great one-time stunt. But in
end
news coverage did little to attract new customers to Taco Bell. There were no follow-up stories to tell. There was no exciting idea at
heart of
company’s tactic.
It was a stunt. And a funny one. Nothing more.
Taco Bell “made
news.” But it didn’t make news.
Here’s another way of looking at it: “Making
news” is pure expense; making news will generate revenue.
The PR Rainmaker understands this crucial difference.