J. Edgar Hoover and LBJ used to enjoy watching Hoover's agent filmed blackmail evidence for all Washington movers and shakers and we are now a lot more aware of
nature of unelected Tyrant who rulled for five decades. But what involvement did LBJ and Prescott Bush have with Assassination squad headed by G. H. W. Bush. Why was Nixon in a Dallas hotel that day? Was JFK going to do more than end Cold War and CIA? Did he intend to de-classify documents that are now available which cause survivors of Auschwitz to sue GHW Bush? LYNDON JOHNSON – THE DAY AFTER DALLAS:
How could Kennedy's and their extended family including Sargent Shriver and McGeorge Bundy (another Merovingian family of primary importance like Russell, Onassis, Reynolds, Li, Collins, Rothschild, Dupont, Astor, Rockefeller names.) allow assassination of their young prodigy. Did they know his sexual and out of control drug appetites? Was their image more important or was idea of an end to Cold War too threatening to their present investments? The end of this entry will include as many questions as we ask and a whole bunch more if you really think about these things. Now that we know nature of J. Edgar Hoover and people like Clay Shaw as well as obvious cover up of his involvement with CIA that Allen Dulles and his brother John Foster Dulles were part of (that would have made Jim Garrison a winner in his New Orleans lawsuit) a more complete cover up and ensuing deceit than most gambits of these times, we can take a better look at Lyndon Johnson.
His campaign manager for his first congressional election confessed they stuffed ballot boxes on his death bed. He enjoyed viewing sex tapes that J. Edgar kept over head of all Washington politicos and lobbyists. Lyndon was man Pentagon and armaments manufacturers could trust to expand war in Vietnam. He did just THAT; despite running against stated purposes of Barry Goldwater to declare war and use tactical weapons rather than Agent Orange (which served a horror similar to Gulf War Syndrome, upon American soldiers) to clear jungles - on road to an efficient end to a debacle.
William Manchester wrote a book shortly after event that does little to answer any questions raised so far - it was called The Death of President. A lot of people might say a great deal more than a President was lost when plot played out its dastardly scheme over ensuing years. We can only hope that some day naïve and innocent will actually demand an accounting from government that has brought them Watergate and lots of other less than honest events to consider since then. We can only ask you to consider acts of other governments and P2 or Vatican groups that are part of this whole scenario. We can't expect any such thing; but we will provide a setting and you will choose whether you really want to know what might disturb your sleep as you think of all things your kids are being given to deal with (that we are only willing to deny, collectively as a society).
"Schlesinger was a man of generous spirit. Yet even he did not know that McGeorge Bundy, efficiency expert, human computer, robot of tempered steel--that Mac had cried in night for John Kennedy.
{PLEASE! What trite and unproven trash, and when will any journalist mention word Merovingian on national TV?}
An individual's attitude toward shift in power was, in short, almost entirely a matter of temperament. Background was entirely irrelevant. Schlesinger, Galbraith, and Bundy had all been recruited from Harvard faculty. Ken O'Donnell was not seen in Vice Presidential suite all day, yet Larry O'Brien went over to discuss a Congressional maneuver which would boost Russian wheat sale, and Sargent Shriver, President Kennedy's brother-in-law, was a realist by any standard. Anxious to see an orderly change of government, Shriver walked across West Executive and volunteered his services. When he attempted to bring two groups together and ran into what he called a 'lot of flak', he was baffled. In retrospect flak may seem puzzling now {Why?}. In context of that Saturday, however, events were very different. The loyalists, swept up in mightiest current of emotion in their lives, were determined to show proper respect toward murdered President. The realists played a valuable and difficult role--and history may award them higher grade, for their service to national interest was great.
