Learning From All Our RelationshipsWritten by Margaret Paul, Ph.D.
The following article is offered for free use in your ezine, print publication or on your web site, so long as author resource box at end is included. Notification of publication would be appreciated.Title: Learning From All Our Relationships Author: Margaret Paul, Ph.D. E-mail: mailto:margaret@innerbonding.com Copyright: © 2003 by Margaret Paul Web Address: http://www.innerbonding.com Word Count: 698 Category: Relationships LEARNING FROM ALL OUR RELATIONSHIPS By Margaret Paul, Ph.D. All of our issues come up in our relationships - our fears of domination, rejection, abandonment, of being wrong, embarrassed, or humiliated. Relationships bring up our deepest fears of loss of self and loss of other, which triggers our deep learned protections - anger, judgment, withdrawal, resistance, and compliance. While our dysfunctional patterns emerge most clearly in primary relationships with a partner, these patterns are certainly activated in friendships, work relationships, and relationships with our parents and children. Therefore, if you are not in a primary relationship with a partner, do not despair! You can still be learning from and evolving through all your relationships. Craig, one of my clients, has not been in a committed relationship for about seven years. Yet most of work we do together revolves around problems he has in his work relationships and friendships. Craig is a person who hates to be controlled by others. As soon as he feels someone wanting something from him such as time, attention, or approval, he feels smothered and withdraws. He is highly sensitive to people coming to him from an inner emptiness and "pulling" on him to fill them up. However, his withdrawal doesn’t work well for him. When a "puller" comes up against Craig’s resistance, other person tends to pull even more. Craig, who doesn’t want to appear rude, ends up giving himself up and caretaking - giving person what he or she wants. He then feels angry and finds himself not even wanting to be around that person any more. This same dynamic occurred in both of his marriages. Craig is in process of developing a powerful adult self who can speak his truth when feeling pulled on rather than withdrawing or complying. He is learning that it may be loving to himself to be open to learning with other person and say something like, "I feel there is something you are wanting from me. What is it?" He is learning that it may be loving to himself to say, "When you pull on me for approval (or time or attention), it doesn’t feel good. I would like to have a caring relationship with you, but I don’t want to be responsible for your good feelings."
| | Traumas as Social InteractionsWritten by Sam Vaknin
("He" in this text - to mean "He" or "She").We react to serious mishaps, life altering setbacks, disasters, abuse, and death by going through phases of grieving. Traumas are complex outcomes of psychodynamic and biochemical processes. But particulars of traumas depend heavily on interaction between victim and his social milieu. It would seem that while victim progresses from denial to helplessness, rage, depression and thence to acceptance of traumatizing events - society demonstrates a diametrically opposed progression. This incompatibility, this mismatch of psychological phases is what leads to formation and crystallization of trauma. PHASE I Victim phase I - DENIAL The magnitude of such unfortunate events is often so overwhelming, their nature so alien, and their message so menacing - that denial sets in as a defence mechanism aimed at self preservation. The victim denies that event occurred, that he or she is being abused, that a loved one passed away. Society phase I - ACCEPTANCE, MOVING ON The victim's nearest ("Society") - his colleagues, his employees, his clients, even his spouse, children, and friends - rarely experience events with same shattering intensity. They are likely to accept bad news and move on. Even at their most considerate and empathic, they are likely to lose patience with victim's state of mind. They tend to ignore victim, or chastise him, to mock, or to deride his feelings or behaviour, to collude to repress painful memories, or to trivialize them. Summary Phase I The mismatch between victim's reactive patterns and emotional needs and society's matter-of-fact attitude hinders growth and healing. The victim requires society's help in avoiding a head-on confrontation with a reality he cannot digest. Instead, society serves as a constant and mentally destabilizing reminder of root of victim's unbearable agony (the Job syndrome). PHASE II Victim phase II - HELPLESSNESS Denial gradually gives way to a sense of all-pervasive and humiliating helplessness, often accompanied by debilitating fatigue and mental disintegration. These are among classic symptoms of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). These are bitter results of internalization and integration of harsh realization that there is nothing one can do to alter outcomes of a natural, or man-made, catastrophe. The horror in confronting one's finiteness, meaninglessness, negligibility, and powerlessness - is overpowering. Society phase II - DEPRESSION The more members of society come to grips with magnitude of loss, or evil, or threat represented by grief inducing events - sadder they become. Depression is often little more than suppressed or self-directed anger. The anger, in this case, is belatedly induced by an identified or diffuse source of threat, or of evil, or loss. It is a higher level variant of "fight or flight" reaction, tampered by rational understanding that "source" is often too abstract to tackle directly. Summary Phase II Thus, when victim is most in need, terrified by his helplessness and adrift - society is immersed in depression and unable to provide a holding and supporting environment. Growth and healing is again retarded by social interaction. The victim's innate sense of annulment is enhanced by self-addressed anger (=depression) of those around him. PHASE III Both victim and society react with RAGE to their predicaments. In an effort to narcissistically reassert himself, victim develops a grandiose sense of anger directed at paranoidally selected, unreal, diffuse, and abstract targets (=frustration sources). By expressing aggression, victim re-acquires mastery of world and of himself. Members of society use rage to re-direct root cause of their depression (which is, as we said, self directed anger) and to channel it safely. To ensure that this expressed aggression alleviates their depression - real targets must are selected and real punishments meted out. In this respect, "social rage" differs from victim's. The former is intended to sublimate aggression and channel it in a socially acceptable manner - latter to reassert narcissistic self-love as an antidote to an all-devouring sense of helplessness.
|