In The Internet, Size Doesn't Matter!

Written by Nach Maravilla


Inrepparttar good old days, a company was considered BIG if they occupied spacious and well-furnished offices, owned their buildings complete with spacious parking lots, hired hundreds of employees and purchased expensive advertising slots in TV, Radio, Magazines and Newspapers. These companies are visible everywhere. Their corporate names are printed in capitalized bold letters inrepparttar 119062 phone books. Everyone – well, almost everyone -- are familiar with their names.

It’s a different story now.

Inrepparttar 119063 virtual community,repparttar 119064 small guys are givingrepparttar 119065 big boys a run for their money. With sheer guts and a few thousand dollars to start up, a lot of home-based entrepreneurs are making a killing day-in and day-out onrepparttar 119066 Internet. All done inrepparttar 119067 private confines of their little home-offices (very often called, kitchen, dining, garage, bedroom, den or whatever part ofrepparttar 119068 house).

Inrepparttar 119069 Internet, we small guys don’t have to fearrepparttar 119070 big guys. We can spend sleepless nights pouring all those tutorial books on HTML programming to createrepparttar 119071 site that will clobber those million-dollar creations to pieces. If they cannot stand you, they can buy you out! And I am sure that you like that, as it will make you rich!

We small guys have more flexibility with our operations. We have more control. We can do what we want. In fact, althoughrepparttar 119072 big boys haverepparttar 119073 money to squander, they are incapable of doing what we small fries can do at a click ofrepparttar 119074 “mouse”. For example, it will take five working days or maybe a week or more, for a big corporation to make a very simple change of a misspelled word onrepparttar 119075 website. If that mistake was observed atrepparttar 119076 time whenrepparttar 119077 person in charge ofrepparttar 119078 Internet was on three-month vacation leave, that error may have to stay there whilerepparttar 119079 whole company suffersrepparttar 119080 degradation that a simple word brought about.

One thing we can observe in most websites ofrepparttar 119081 big boys is that it remainsrepparttar 119082 same almost forever (except forrepparttar 119083 news and media sites that need to be updated daily). Why? Because, nobody can change it on his own volition. Changes may have to passrepparttar 119084 approval ofrepparttar 119085 manager; sometimes evenrepparttar 119086 board of directors orrepparttar 119087 chairman ofrepparttar 119088 board. When a thing is approved, it then goes back downrepparttar 119089 corporate ladder followingrepparttar 119090 same steps as when it went up. Whenrepparttar 119091 changes are made, new developments have happened andrepparttar 119092 change may not be needed anymore. Ironically, because ofrepparttar 119093 internal squabble necessary to get things done, big corporations are not very enthusiastic about their presence onrepparttar 119094 Web.

Heavy Online Usage During Crisis

Written by Rob Spiegel


The Internet played a considerable role inrepparttar aftermath ofrepparttar 119061 terrorist attack on New York City and Washington, DC. The best andrepparttar 119062 worst of online usage emerged as email and instant messaging became prime sources of communication. News-based Web sites bogged down from high traffic. Many popular news sites froze fromrepparttar 119063 spike in traffic. Here are a few ofrepparttar 119064 more striking uses ofrepparttar 119065 Web duringrepparttar 119066 early hours and days ofrepparttar 119067 disaster.

Instant messaging worked when phone failed

Instant messaging became one ofrepparttar 119068 stars inrepparttar 119069 early hours afterrepparttar 119070 attack as consumers and businesses corresponded one-to-one when phone lines quit working in part of New York City. America Online reported that 1.2 billion messages were sent via instant messaging and on AOL's proprietary client software on September 11 alone.

Amazon and Yahoo accepted Red Cross donations

Both Amazon.com and Yahoo.com allowed contributors to make donations torepparttar 119071 Red Cross to help victims ofrepparttar 119072 disaster. By Friday morning afterrepparttar 119073 disaster, Amazon reported 121,579 payments had been made torepparttar 119074 Red Cross, totaling $4,394,870.41, according to News.com. Both companies waivedrepparttar 119075 fees they normally charge for facilitating payments.

Hackers waged vigilante strikes against Palestinian and Afghani sites

Online hacker groups hacked into Palestinian and Afghani Web sites afterrepparttar 119076 terrorist attacks. One vigilante group, The Dispatchers, is a group of 60 hackers that includes The Rev, a hacker who defacedrepparttar 119077 New York Times financial quote service last February. The hackers released a statement claiming they had united to fight back and disable sites. According to The Rev, several Palestinian-affiliated Internet service providers have now been disabled. The group claimed it will next work to shut down Afghani sites.

Online scams exploited disaster

A particularly ugly creature ofrepparttar 119078 online world rose its awful head when Internet scammers started to solicit donations for victims and survivors of repparttar 119079 attacks. The scams came inrepparttar 119080 form on unsolicited email and postings in community forums. The crooks claimed to be part of an "Express Relief Fund" or "Victims Survivor Fund." Another scam actually asked for donations forrepparttar 119081 Red Cross, butrepparttar 119082 link led to a Web site unconnected torepparttar 119083 organization. The scams started within an hour ofrepparttar 119084 WTC attack, according to ZDNet.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use