The US-backed Road Map peace plan had no real chance of success because Israel was
only signatory living up to its side of
agreement, former US House of Representatives Speaker Newt Gingrich wrote recently.“Diplomacy is important and has a vital role to play [in solving
Israeli-Arab conflict], but its function must be different than
Oslo process and
Road Map suggest,” Gingrich argued in
summer edition of Middle East Quarterly.
“The focus on Israeli-Palestinian diplomacy cannot work when one side has a leadership that does not deliver on its word.”
The 2008 presidential hopeful noted that “in order for diplomacy to work, negotiators must be honest brokers willing to keep commitments,” an area in which Gingrich noted
Palestinian Authority leadership was lacking.
“Diplomacy should not be used as political checkmate while one side keeps its word, and
other side willfully disregards its promises to gain political advantage,” he wrote.
Gingrich called
Road Map, which was largely formulated by
Bush Administration, a “product of a period of failure now past,” and urged Washington, “It is time to move on.”
He said
basis for Israeli-Arab peace “should be
destruction of
terrorists,” and that negotiations should cease until
Palestinian Authority fulfilled its decade-old commitment to disarm and dismantle
terrorist infrastructure operating out of areas under its control.