Human Cultural Evolution(?)Written by Robert Bruce Baird
Human Cultural Evolution:
If we think about it at this juncture, clearly there is little to commend this Judaeo/ Christian/Islamic God if he is represented by people who led this church. Pagans have a far better history and stand foursquare and ‘head and shoulders’ above this God of this often re-written Bible. The separation of man from his soul; man from his equal (woman); man from Nature and man from most all that is good; is all I see! Maybe Melchizedek or some other Biblical character (like Mormon secret society is named after) will be raised up and made a new savior. Maybe it will be John Baptist (the Johannites and Benjaminites) or it might even be one of censored people of Bible like Jasher who will be re-cycled and make it appear they’ve changed. Whatever it is, I don't want same structure and would like to see people DOING what Jesus did. Thinking for themselves and communing with his soul 'within' to touch beauty in all nature!
We can't expect many people to read such a totally different picture of history and not challenge our ideas. We are including best scholars we can and yet there will be many who are so threatened they will say all kinds of bad things about us. We know that there are risks and that ‘powers that be’ will not help make this 'stuff' become common knowledge. The Hermetic 'cults' of Egypt and Greece that were so popular when people were allowed to follow knowledge (more) in early Hellenistic times were from Isis and Osiris. They were founders of Egypt who were not Gods. Like Moses and Jesus who rabbis tell us became object of hero worship so it has often been with great people once they are dead. Priests take peoples' good opinion of their heroes and turn them into 'cults' with themselves as key interpreters. Readers who study hard and have an open mind will find a veritable mine field of ‘stuff’ to try to sift through in order to find any essence of truth. I see some great truth might exist as I contemplate naturally growing nanotubes and lattices or helixes that all energy manifests through. The whole universe vibrates according to an intelligent design such as mathematically demonstrated by Dembski. There is no reason to have made Darwin out to be a pure evolutionist. His Theory of Love is just as important. Although he was forced to differentiate himself from Lamarck he was in fact inspired by him. Few enough are scientists who see there are divergent forces at work in all truthful outcomes. The quality of energy is as important as quantity of energy, in whatever forces impact mutation. It is not unreasonable to say there is a collective force with purpose in some Divinely Providential construct. It is folly however, to think a mere human might fully comprehend it. That kind of ideology smacks of religious claptrap, I know. Nonetheless I propose there is merit in Dembski and all open-minded evaluations of what might be. We are often seeing science or present fad therein proclaims an absolute proof that is subsequently proven false. I like atomic physicists who were called atom-mysticists at first. Neils Bohr was one of them and he observed something like following: “A great truth has an opposite, which is also true. A trivial truth has an opposite which is only a falsehood.” We have endured ‘experts’ of mechanistic professionalism far too long. Their ego has made them cling to fads and fictions with most ignorant among us. When Edison’s phonograph was presented to Paris Academy of Sciences they throttled presenter as they claimed he was a ventriloquist. At end of 19th Century a Patent Office Official said they should close down because everything that could be discovered had been already patented. This is kind of sunshine law that all bureaucracies should install but not because they are right about no more inventions being possible. Even worse is early 20th Century Britannica proclaiming torture was a thing of past in ‘civilized’ Europe? Clearly we must do our own thinking. “Although Darwin was in habit of repudiating violently any intimation that he had profited from Lamarck, we have already seen that he was acquainted at an early age with English versions of latter’s work and in 1845 there is a reference in an unpublished letter to Lyell (Biblio: In possession of American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.) regarding ‘my volumes of Lamarck.’” (1) Lamarckian evolutionary theory allows for mix of creation and impact of directed creative and psychic or soulful participation. If God is everything and we all act in concert, there is a powerful collective force to be reckoned with. We might even change nature of our Noble leaders by holding them in light. Let us not cling to theory that faith or fad alone limits and selects facts to fit prevailing ‘norm’. Dembski must not be censored and censured by biologists who fight to maintain their stranglehold on evolutionary theory. Charles Fort and Arthur Koestler are as wise as any who have ‘observed’ in last century and they would not encourage such censure, I am sure. Creation should not be laid at feet of God and we are part of God, we must act responsibly and with right action and thought. Come with me, and bring an open-mind that you can assimilate and later test. I will endeavour to see ‘light’ in all its harmonizing glory. Barthold Niebuhr put adventure in these relevant words: “He who calls what has vanished back again into being, enjoys a BLISS like that of creating.” Thor Heyerdahl was such a person. His insight changed a lot of academic attitudes as he proved many things held sacred were anything but correct. We need to provide far better reason for a change in opinions than prevailing paradigm if only because they have such a stranglehold on opinion. The propagandists have many writers and academics at their beck and call. This has been true for many millennia, and they have had ability to destroy most evidence that would disprove their fictions or myths. That is one reason why linguistics and botany or other forensic tools are best evidences for our effort to present an alternative history. Even when a 99% archaeological certainty that fits facts and established criteria to keep much truth out of realm of accepted evidence – such as Roman statue or head found in Mexico – there are those who debunk it or make it seem unimportant. My personal knowledge of statues at Chichen Itza convinces me there were many Etruscan and Greek artisans at work in Central America. If you ever go there be sure to drop in on Villas Archaeologique. As you read Heyerdahl in following quote be cognizant that five separate forensic labs have concurred that cocaine from Peru was part of diet mummies of Egypt enjoyed. Balabanova was well aware of implications of this upon world history. That is why she had all other labs test her results. Lanning provides artefacts detailing those involved in this trade. These secrets were very important to potion makers or pharmacists of ancient world. Hallucinatory drugs probably started Phoenicians down this road a long time before Egypt. Our artefacts and evidence on stone and bas-reliefs includes ancient handshake of Phoenician enterprise that I think Moses and his family benefited from for a very long time.
EqualityWritten by dr anil maheshwari
What is Equality? Are men and women really equal to each other??????????? Please read on to find out! Anatomically-(physically)-------both are different. Physiologically(relating to sex-hormones)--------both are different. Genetically ---------both are different and have different reproductive systems------(xx=female)------(xy=male) Biologically-(sexually)-------both have different needs. Emotionally-------both react differently to situations in day-to-day life. Mentally------both think differently about values of life or otherwise. Socially and Traditionally------both have different roles and duties to perform in society----Man is basically Bread-winner and Provider-----Woman is basically a care-taker(nurse). From family view-point---a man(father) is considered as head(intellect) of family and woman(mother) is heart of family. In chinese mythology---- The female force is represented by Yin(negative force of universe) & male force is represented by Yang(positive force) Everything about a man and a woman is different----right from their physical appearence, their needs, duties they perform, roles they play in society, and even way they procreate ---- in act of creation (sexual act)---man is active partner--the sexual act being initiated, maintained, completed and dominated by male(man usually in superior position)---while female is just passive recepient---and conceptually too man being 'seed' and woman being 'soil'.