Have Analysts Gotten Honest?

Written by Mark Mahorney


It caught my attention when I heard an analyst on a popular financial news program tell investors to sell a stock because too many analysts likedrepparttar company, citingrepparttar 139905 fact that there were no sell ratings.

It seemed perfectly logical to me that analysts wouldn’t be telling investors to sell 3M (MMM), which has one ofrepparttar 139906 most consistent positive earnings records inrepparttar 139907 history ofrepparttar 139908 stock markets. But being suspicious of conflicts of interest between brokerage firms and analysts I decided to do a bit of fact checking anyway.

Whilerepparttar 139909 stock did not have any sell ratings atrepparttar 139910 time of writing, there were quite a few hold ratings. Now I feel compelled to diverge here and say thatrepparttar 139911 hold rating seems quite illogical to me. If a stock is good enough to hold it’s good enough to buy, and vice versa if you wouldn’t want to buy it then you shouldn’t want to hold on to it either.

As it turns out,repparttar 139912 average analyst rating for 3M was only slightly and insignificantly better thanrepparttar 139913 average for all stocks inrepparttar 139914 Dow Jones Industrial Average, of whichrepparttar 139915 company is a component.

But what was most interesting aboutrepparttar 139916 ratings on Dow components was that, despite numerous and serious legal problems, AIG (AIG) was tied with General Electric (GE) and Du Pont (DD) forrepparttar 139917 third best rating, only bested by Citigroup (C) and Microsoft (MSFT). AIG was actually more highly recommended by analysts than J.P. Morgan Chase’s (JPM) and American Express (AXP).

Utah, the Nation’s Bankruptcy Capital

Written by Charles Essmeier


Congress recently passedrepparttar Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act, designed to minimize frivolous bankruptcy filings and to require debtors to repay some of their debt. Once it takes effect in October, 2005,repparttar 139874 law will make it harder for those with problem debt to have their debt wiped away byrepparttar 139875 courts. Most will have to agree to a five-year repayment plan. In passing this new law, members of Congress suggested that our bankruptcy courts are filled with cases involving not ordinary citizens, but with reckless gamblers, shoppers, and drug abusers. Is that reallyrepparttar 139876 case?

One would think, givenrepparttar 139877 accusations, thatrepparttar 139878 highest bankruptcy rate inrepparttar 139879 Untied States would be in place where such vices were common, such as California, New York or even Nevada. If problem gambling is thought to berepparttar 139880 cause of so much bankruptcy, then one might assume that Las Vegas would berepparttar 139881 bankruptcy capital ofrepparttar 139882 world. How odd it is, then, to discover that Utah, one of only two states that prohibits gambling completely, hasrepparttar 139883 highest per capita incidence of bankruptcy filings inrepparttar 139884 United States. Utah? How can that be?

Utah has a number of aspects that, taken on their own, don’t suggest that bankruptcy would be a problem. Added together, however, these things create a recipe for disaster:
  • Utah hasrepparttar 139885 nation’s highest birthrate. Seventy

  • Cont'd on page 2 ==>
     
    ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
    Terms of Use