You have permission to publish this article electronically or in print, free of charge, as long as
article is not altered and
resource box is left intact. A courtesy copy of your publication would be appreciated. Send to: marbasics@yahoo.comThis article was written as a result of a heated discussion we had on a particular Internet marketing forum recently, regarding another article we wrote titled, "Why People Buy: The Psychology Of Sales And Marketing."
The subject of race came up during
discussion, and we didn't feel that an Internet marketing forum was
proper forum to discuss racial issues. So, we decided to write this article to voice our opinions and viewpoints about
subject of race and marketing.
There's a strange phenomenon occuring in
National Basketball Association. The league is getting whiter and more foreign, and many African-American fans and players suspect there's a lot more going on than international meritocracy.
The perception--and perception is reality in matters of race- -is that
NBA is trying to phase-out African American players because of corporate (white) fans and international marketing money. In other words,
thinking is, more white guys who can play equals big bucks. So what, if they're from another country.
What's going on here? Is this blatant racism at work? We think it is, yes. However, those who debunk
race theory are quick to point out
fact that
stockholders, ticket buyers, and corporate sponsors are predominately white. And it's simply not smart business to ignore your financial backers. Therefore, they argue, it goes a lot deeper than blatantly phasing-out African Americans. It's about money, and
people who control it.
What a bunch of bull! Let's get real here, shall we? We're talking about big business, people. This should be strictly about putting
best possible product on
floor every night--period. The color of a player's skin shouldn't matter, but to some, it clearly does. The NBA is obviously "too black" for some in corporate America. A small percentage of corporate America wants to see more white players. It's that simple. And what corporate America wants, corporate America usually gets--even if it ends up turning into an unnecessarily expensive lesson in economics in
long run.
We just don't understand that kind of backward-ass thinking. Here's why: Over
last 20 years, Michael Jordan and Tiger Woods phenomenal popularity has been unprecendented in
history of sports marketing.
Currently, Tiger Woods is practically
epitome of sports marketing as he transcends
sport itself, which is exactly what makes him unique. Nike CEO Philip Knight explains that every time they discover a one of a kind athlete like this one, they have to "adopt" him. The reason behind this is that such an athlete is bound to result in something unique no matter what.
Tiger is
world's greatest athlete and he is getting compensated accordingly. Fans across
globe are glued to their television sets to see his next amazing exploit, even if they don't know
difference between a 3-wood and a 9- iron. Tiger has elevated
seemingly mundane game of golf to another level. He has single-handedly brought golf to
masses.
With
phenomenal success and popularity of Tiger Woods and other African American athletes, it's obvious, that
average white person walking
streets in America could care less about skin color. This is especially true of young, white adults in
18 to 24 age group--the ones who propel
majority of CD sales.