You have permission to publish this article electronically or in print, free of charge, as long as article is not altered and resource box is left intact. A courtesy copy of your publication would be appreciated. Send to: marbasics@yahoo.comThis article was written as a result of a heated discussion we had on a particular Internet marketing forum recently, regarding another article we wrote titled, "Why People Buy: The Psychology Of Sales And Marketing."
The subject of race came up during discussion, and we didn't feel that an Internet marketing forum was proper forum to discuss racial issues. So, we decided to write this article to voice our opinions and viewpoints about subject of race and marketing.
There's a strange phenomenon occuring in National Basketball Association. The league is getting whiter and more foreign, and many African-American fans and players suspect there's a lot more going on than international meritocracy.
The perception--and perception is reality in matters of race- -is that NBA is trying to phase-out African American players because of corporate (white) fans and international marketing money. In other words, thinking is, more white guys who can play equals big bucks. So what, if they're from another country.
What's going on here? Is this blatant racism at work? We think it is, yes. However, those who debunk race theory are quick to point out fact that stockholders, ticket buyers, and corporate sponsors are predominately white. And it's simply not smart business to ignore your financial backers. Therefore, they argue, it goes a lot deeper than blatantly phasing-out African Americans. It's about money, and people who control it.
What a bunch of bull! Let's get real here, shall we? We're talking about big business, people. This should be strictly about putting best possible product on floor every night--period. The color of a player's skin shouldn't matter, but to some, it clearly does. The NBA is obviously "too black" for some in corporate America. A small percentage of corporate America wants to see more white players. It's that simple. And what corporate America wants, corporate America usually gets--even if it ends up turning into an unnecessarily expensive lesson in economics in long run.
We just don't understand that kind of backward-ass thinking. Here's why: Over last 20 years, Michael Jordan and Tiger Woods phenomenal popularity has been unprecendented in history of sports marketing.
Currently, Tiger Woods is practically epitome of sports marketing as he transcends sport itself, which is exactly what makes him unique. Nike CEO Philip Knight explains that every time they discover a one of a kind athlete like this one, they have to "adopt" him. The reason behind this is that such an athlete is bound to result in something unique no matter what.
Tiger is world's greatest athlete and he is getting compensated accordingly. Fans across globe are glued to their television sets to see his next amazing exploit, even if they don't know difference between a 3-wood and a 9- iron. Tiger has elevated seemingly mundane game of golf to another level. He has single-handedly brought golf to masses.
With phenomenal success and popularity of Tiger Woods and other African American athletes, it's obvious, that average white person walking streets in America could care less about skin color. This is especially true of young, white adults in 18 to 24 age group--the ones who propel majority of CD sales.