You’re
boss, and you have every reason to feel good about your organization. You’ve built a great team. You’ve put strong players in every spot. You have clearly defined procedures for every part of
business. You have incentive, safety recognition, and bonus programs.
But something doesn’t seem quite right.
Somehow, there seems to be a sense of unease. You can’t put your finger on it exactly, but you know it’s there. It’s what you wake up at 2 a.m. worrying about.
What are
symptoms? Well, it’s not that precise. It’s
little things. Like, well, you spend too much time monitoring your workers – checking time sheets, correcting behavior problems, and dealing with attitude problems. People seem to be “doing their own thing” instead of being a part of a team.
Sound familiar?
It should, because getting optimal team performance is a common problem for business owners, from
largest corporation to
mom and pop business. Building a strong team provides
foundation for good performance, but that is only part of
process. As
manager, you need to encourage behaviors that create positive business results.
A powerful tool for encouraging these behaviors is
use of targeted positive reinforcement within a well defined performance management system. Much has been written about
use of positive reinforcement in recent years, but many managers and business owners still struggle with how to apply it appropriately. One reason many people do not hoped for results is a misunderstanding of how reinforcement strategies really work.
Much more than “pats on
back”, “atta-boys”, and “warm fuzzies”,
effective use of positive reinforcement strategies in a structured performance management system relies on knowledge of your business systems, understanding
effect of specific employee behaviors on business results, and precisely targeted behavioral reinforcements.
Creating a strong performance management system starts with understanding why people do what they do.
One model of explaining human behavior says that an individual’s behavior results from
consistent pairing of antecedents (situations or events just prior to our behaviors) and consequences (situations or events created by our behaviors).