============================================================ Do you use this approach to Position Contracts? ============================================================See full color web version and even listen to this PVT, visit: http://www.SeniorManagementServices.com/pvt-94-position-contracts.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "I couldn't wait for success... so I went ahead without it." -- Jonathan Winters ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
============================================================ More Org Chart boxes than people? ============================================================
In previous issues of Profitable Venture Tactics (PVT), I have discussed how to develop your Strategic Objective, Organizational Strategy, and Org Charts. For best results you must develop these in order, before you develop your Position Contracts.
1. Strategic Objective 2. Organizational Strategy 3. Org Charts
(For more information on these topics, see PVTs 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 22, 29, 36, 42, 58, 60, 65, 81)
In this issue, I will attempt to tell you how to determine best sequence to develop Position Contracts.
Whether you're in a business start-up or small business, you face this one problem:
"More boxes (on Org Chart) than people."
In other words, when you first develop your company's Org Chart, you see how number of positions (boxes) exceeds available people to fill them. So inevitably, certain people must occupy two or more positions at once.
While filling more than one position has inherent problems, it also complicates how you sequence development of Position Contracts. Let me explain.
============================================================ What are limitations of this "Standard Approach?" ============================================================
If you stick to "standard approach" to developing Position Contracts, you'll use following strict procedure.
You develop Position Contract for President (or CEO, or an equivalent title). You then have this Contract approved and adopted. (For more on Position Contracts, see PVTs 15, 18, 81)
Then you proceed to next management level (typically VPs). Again, you (or someone) would write Contracts for approval (with likely revisions) and adoption.
Diligently, you continue this process down your entire Org Chart, one level at a time, until you reach lowest positions.
Here's Good News:
This "standard approach" is good since it sticks to idea that a Contract for any position must be derived from its immediate managing position ("above"). Thus, process is orderly and logical.