Divorce online service. Why should we lose money and time applying for divorce?

Written by James Wood

It is usually easier to marry than to divorce, especially ifrepparttar spouses who wish to do so must divide their common property as well.

Divorce is extremely difficult business in rich families. For wealthy Americans in this case, it is accepted thatrepparttar 119295 former husband or wife may pay rather large sums of money forrepparttar 119296 divorce process. It is not enough thatrepparttar 119297 divorce in itself involves strong emotional stress, so they also pay an extra thousand on top ofrepparttar 119298 $10-20,000 to lawyers to carry out this occupation, and sometimes it is even more.

Why should we loserepparttar 119299 money and time applying for divorce, if there isrepparttar 119300 cheap and fast alternative - divorce online. You findrepparttar 119301 site, take your mouse, you press onrepparttar 119302 button - and you are a divorced person. With a minimum of formalities, as in Las Vegas, forrepparttar 119303 conclusion of a failed marriage appearsrepparttar 119304 divorce.

To terminate a marriage on site, a couple wanting to apply for divorce need only a credit card and a computer with access torepparttar 119305 Internet. The divorce case was finished within 30 minutes and cost $199.

People who hate discussing and relaying specific instances in dialogues with lawyers userepparttar 119306 services ofrepparttar 119307 site. Inrepparttar 119308 virtual world of divorce,repparttar 119309 couple that does not require court, after inputting all necessary data for divorce, merely printsrepparttar 119310 forms, signs them, and sends them torepparttar 119311 judge. That is all.

Trademark opposition practice

Written by Ludmila M. Serova

In our firm 's practice trademark registrations which reproduce well-known trademarks of foreign owners or similar to them meet routinely.

The grounds for getting such registrations by unfair players are quite clear, but it should be kept in mind that according torepparttar Russian Trademark Law they might be opposed and canceled. We would like to illustraterepparttar 119294 aforesaid with several examples. In 1997repparttar 119295 trademark WHITE &MACKAY was registered inrepparttar 119296 name of "FRINO " Ltd.,(Russia)with respect to services in Classes 35,36,part of services in Class 39,namely "transportation, packing and storing of goods excluding alcoholic drinks " and Class 42,namely "restaurants, hotels, realization of goods excluding alcoholic drinks ".

When it revealed, an opposition to said registration was filed for our client,repparttar 119297 well-known producer of beverages, owner ofrepparttar 119298 Russian trademark registration of WHITE & MACKAY, with respect torepparttar 119299 goods in Class 33 "alcoholic beverages, whisky ".The opposition mentions thatrepparttar 119300 registration inrepparttar 119301 name of "FRINO " Ltd .is obtained in violation of Article 7 (1)ofrepparttar 119302 Russian Trademark Law, which prohibits a registration of designations confusingly similar to trademarks earlier registered in Russia by other individual or legal entity with respect to similar goods and services. Moreover, said registration of "Frino " Ltd. contradicts to Article 6 (2)ofrepparttar 119303 Law that says "a registration should not be granted to a trademark which might mislead a consumer with respect torepparttar 119304 person who renders services."Among arguments inrepparttar 119305 opposition we putrepparttar 119306 following. WHITE and MACKAY are common English surnames.

MACKAY might be associated with English or Scottish origin ofrepparttar 119307 registration owner, which is not true in respect of "FRINO " Ltd. located in Ingushetiya, Russia.

From geographic sources it was showed that WHITE and MACKAY are also geographical names, i.e. WHITE is an island in South-East England, MACKAY isrepparttar 119308 name ofrepparttar 119309 town inrepparttar 119310 State of Idaho (USA) andrepparttar 119311 name ofrepparttar 119312 town in Australia. Also data about popularity ofrepparttar 119313 mark WHITE &MACKAY were supplied, namely, that WHITE & MACKAY Scotch whiskey had been produced since 1844 and enjoyed by consumers all overrepparttar 119314 world. Additionally numerous registrations of said trademark throughoutrepparttar 119315 world were presented torepparttar 119316 Board of Appeals ofrepparttar 119317 Russian PTO which accepted some ofrepparttar 119318 arguments and stated thatrepparttar 119319 opposed andrepparttar 119320 cited marks were similar in view of phonetic and semantic identity thereof, with high degree of visual similarity.

Some ofrepparttar 119321 services in Classes 35,39,42 are related torepparttar 119322 realization of goods, and in view of high degree of similarity ofrepparttar 119323 compared marks, a consumer may misunderstand that all these services and goods belong to one andrepparttar 119324 same producer. Having considered allrepparttar 119325 groundsrepparttar 119326 Board of Appeals satisfiedrepparttar 119327 opposition and canceledrepparttar 119328 registration of "Frino " Ltd. partially by deletingrepparttar 119329 services in Class 35related to advertising, services in Class 39 related to transportation, delivery and storage of goods, services in Class 42 related to restaurants, hotels and realization of goods.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use