Demographic Trend You Need to Know About

Written by Susan Dunn


There is a demographic trend of which HR personnel, management, business owners, and CEOs need to be aware. According to demographic trends analyst, Cheryl Russell, byrepparttar year 2005,repparttar 106105 most common household inrepparttar 106106 US will be single-person households. "Never before in American history has living alone beenrepparttar 106107 predominant lifestyle," says Russell, andrepparttar 106108 time is fast approaching.

According torepparttar 106109 American Association for Single people (http://www.singlesrights.com/main.html),repparttar 106110 2000 UC Census reported that 82 million men and women inrepparttar 106111 United States are unmarried. This figure includes nearly 20 million adults who are divorced, 13.6 million who are widowed, and more than 48 million who have never married.

· More than 48% of all households inrepparttar 106112 nation are headed by unmarried individuals.

· About 40% ofrepparttar 106113 workforce is unmarried.

· Approximately 36% of people who voted inrepparttar 106114 last national election were unmarried.

· About 27 million Americans live alone, while about 2 million adults live with an unmarried partner.

The Census Bureau has projected that betweenrepparttar 106115 ages of 15 and 85,repparttar 106116 average man and woman will experience more years being unmarried than they will being married.

According to this data, a huge and growing population is choosing to be alone. If you define adults as those over 18, 44% of US adults - that's nearly half -- are singles.

Ofrepparttar 106117 18 to 24 age group, 85.9% are single. This is a very substantial change from a generation ago, and this isrepparttar 106118 group that will be coming your way!

The American Association for Single People (AASP) projects that by 2010, 47.2% ofrepparttar 106119 adults overrepparttar 106120 age of 18 will be unmarried.

If we assume that this trend continues, and Cheryl Russell is notrepparttar 106121 only one who thinks it will, what will this mean torepparttar 106122 workplace?

First of all, there will be increasing pressure for economic, political, corporate, and legal reforms to accommodate this shift to unmarried adults.

Secondly, it seems probable that adults are going to be seeking more connection, and more social contact at work - with nearly half of workers being single.

While living alone does not necessarily mean lonely, it does mean that whatever emotional needs were being met previously by marriage will not be met. Those adults who live alone will have less emotional support and fewer outlets for emotional expression and meaningful contact outside ofrepparttar 106123 workplace.

Can You Hear Me Now?

Written by Dave Russ


Can You Hear Me Now? by Dave Russ

Way back in 1996, Congrss passedrepparttar Telecommunications Act. This ground breaking piece of legislation was enacted to loosenrepparttar 106104 death grip that incumbent Bell monopolies held on consumers wallets... as well as foster competition inrepparttar 106105 long distance and broadband arenas.

Inrepparttar 106106 FCCs own modest declaration... "The Telecommunications Act of 1996 hasrepparttar 106107 potential to change repparttar 106108 way we work, live and learn. It will affect telephone service -- local and long distance, cable programming and other video services, broadcast services and services provided to schools."

"Potential" beingrepparttar 106109 key word here.

Oh, it started out well enough... withrepparttar 106110 usual hype and fanfare associated withrepparttar 106111 Internet heyday. New players, fueled byrepparttar 106112 90s investment frenzy, arose like wildflowers in May... collectively spending billions of dollars onrepparttar 106113 race to blurrepparttar 106114 line betweenrepparttar 106115 old switched networks and repparttar 106116 new IP pipelines.

Breakthrough technologies, such as VOIP (Voice-over-Internet Protocol), threatened to shakerepparttar 106117 very foundation ofrepparttar 106118 telecommunications world, offering consumers viable new choices. Companies like Net2Phone and Dialpad gave anyone with a computer, microphone and dialup connection,repparttar 106119 ability to do an end aroundrepparttar 106120 established long distance carriers.

Soon, VOIP went mainstream, finding its way directly torepparttar 106121 telephone and bypassingrepparttar 106122 need for a computer. "Pay by repparttar 106123 month, not byrepparttar 106124 minute" becamerepparttar 106125 rallying cry of a new generation of long distance marketers... asrepparttar 106126 concept of flat-rate and "unlimited” long distance blossomed. Consumers and small businesses no longer needed to fear receiving a huge long distance bill come months end... as they stepped offrepparttar 106127 per-minute treadmill.

And all was well... or so it seemed.

But did these cutting edge Internet technologies forever changerepparttar 106128 telecom landscape, as promised? Was it time yet for high-fives atrepparttar 106129 FCC... and was a victory parade in order for consumers?

In a word... No.

Quality and reliability issues, indifferent customer service and unsound business practices... exacerbated by repparttar 106130 overall telecom meltdown, wiped out most of these alternate providers... burying them inrepparttar 106131 dot.com graveyard.

Meanwhile,repparttar 106132 Big Three (AT&T, MCI and Sprint) still enjoy repparttar 106133 lions share of US long distance revenues.

And hasrepparttar 106134 local market fared much better? Not really. The 1996 Act requiredrepparttar 106135 regional Bell incumbents to grant access to their UNE-P (Unbundled Network Element-Platform). But like all good monopolies,repparttar 106136 Baby Bells have done everything humanly possible to prevent this access. Just ask Covad, NorthPoint and Rhythms... companies that all had far-reaching aspirations of bringing high speed DSL to everyones doorstep.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use