Credibility - A Golden Key to Becoming More Influential

Written by Kevin Eikenberry


You have been named a new leader in your organization, or you are a long time leader with some new people in your organization. Or maybe you aren’t a formal leader but are working on an important new project. Or perhaps you are staff person with expertise that can benefitrepparttar business… but only if you can get others to see your perspective.

These are just four situations where havingrepparttar 136908 ability to be more influential could make a big difference in our effectiveness.

Regardless of our role, rank or seniority; no matter what our job, we can all benefit from being more influential. After all we are all trying to influence others all day long.

One key to achieving that greater influence is credibility.

Credibility

Enhancing your credibility with others is one ofrepparttar 136909 best ways to become more influential. People want to followrepparttar 136910 advice and counsel of those with expertise, and you want to be one of those people!

It is not enough to be an expert on a subject matter or a situation though. You must also be perceived as an expert. That perception comes from how you carry yourself and interact with others on this subject AND in every other way as well. You see, credibility is more than just expertise. Credibility is a combination of expertise and trustworthiness.

Kevin Hogan, in The Science of Influence states it as a formula:

Credibility = Expertise + Trustworthiness.

Very few people can maintain great influence without both parts of this equation. There are certainly situations whererepparttar 136911 expertise is so profound that idiosyncrasies and even rudeness will be tolerated becauserepparttar 136912 person is so knowledgeable. This is likely notrepparttar 136913 case for all of us.

Onrepparttar 136914 other hand, there are situations where you have likely trusted someone so much that they were credible on subjects they might not have been so expert about. They were still influential with you because of that extremely high trust level. After all, you reason, they care enough about me that they wouldn’t steer me wrong with their advice or suggestions. These cases too, are isolated.

So we need to work on both parts of this combination in order to become more influential.

Expertise

Expertise is certainly a good place to start. If you are an IT professional you better know a router from a right click. If you are in finance, you better know a payment from a promissory note. That is basic expertise, and only a starting point. To greatly increase your influence through your credibility, you must develop your knowledge and expertise consistently and continuously far beyond those basics.

Behavioral Economics? What's That?

Written by Steve Gillman


A new science sheds light on some of our most important decisions.

Behavioral economics isrepparttar study of how and why people make money-related decisions. As a science it is relatively new, although some of its findings have been known intuitively by good salesmen and marketers for many years. Much of what has been learned from recent studies, however, has not yet been applied systematically inrepparttar 136894 real world of business. Here are some ofrepparttar 136895 thingsrepparttar 136896 studies have shown thus far:

Confirmation Bias

We tend to act economically in a way that confirms current belief. When buyingrepparttar 136897 same model of Mecedes, for example, current owners, who presumably already believe inrepparttar 136898 value of a Mercedes, pay $7,000 more, on average, than new Mercedes customers. I'm sure you can imaginerepparttar 136899 value of this knowledge to companies that sell high-priced items.

Decision Paralysis

Studies show that, given four samples of jam, for example, people actually spent more than when they had twenty to choose from. You may not want to tellrepparttar 136900 customer about all 84 colors he can choose from. Limiting options may be a useful sales technique, according to this research finding.

Sunk-Cost Fallacy

This phenomena of behavioral economics persists, even after we're confronted with it's illogical nature. We are more likely to attend an event if we paid forrepparttar 136901 ticket than if we got it free, even when we haverepparttar 136902 same information and interest inrepparttar 136903 event. Sincerepparttar 136904 money is already spent, it has no relevance torepparttar 136905 decision, but even seeing this, aren't most of us going to feel a greater loss throwing away a ticket we paid for than one we got for free?

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use