Continuing change in the Offshore World

Written by The Chesterfield Group


The offshore financial centres have been forced in recent years to review almost every aspect ofrepparttar ways in which they operate in response torepparttar 111866 international anti- money laundering laws and initiatives by major economies such asrepparttar 111867 E.U. andrepparttar 111868 U.S.A. to increase co-operation inrepparttar 111869 areas of preventing tax avoidance and tax evasion. These pressures continue and it is clear thatrepparttar 111870 only way forward is for these centres to eliminate, as a priority, all forms of discrimination between different classes of taxpayer. Some jurisdictions have taken active steps to secure their futures, but some have difficulty in doing so and some are having to give uprepparttar 111871 struggle.

Gibraltar’s tax haven status to be scrapped

Gibraltar is an example of a territory with a discriminatory tax regime. A non-resident may form a company there, which pays an annual flat tax of between £225 and £300. The same company owned by a local resident may pay tax at 35% on its profits. Gibraltar is a member ofrepparttar 111872 E.U. and a dependent territory ofrepparttar 111873 U.K. It was recently announced that Britain, threatened by Court action, has given into E.U. demands to abolishrepparttar 111874 special tax regime.

The Gibraltar exempt company regime will accordingly close as from July 2006 and will be abolished altogether in 2010. Inrepparttar 111875 intervening periodrepparttar 111876 number of companies benefiting fromrepparttar 111877 scheme will be capped at 8464 and any company, which changes ownership, will loserepparttar 111878 benefit immediately.

Jersey

Jersey is another territory, which may encounter problems. It relies heavily onrepparttar 111879 financial sector for its revenue, much of which is generated from a flat corporation tax on companies, owned by non residents, but conducting their trading activity elsewhere, in muchrepparttar 111880 same way as Gibraltar.

Buying property in Portugal

Written by The Chesterfield Group


Portugal has long been a popular choice for people, particularly fromrepparttar colder climates of Northern Europe, looking to purchase a holiday home or a retirement home. Traditionally they have done so using offshore companies, mainly to avoid estate taxes. Unfortunately Portugal, along with some other countries, has made this route considerably less attractive byrepparttar 111865 imposition of swingeing tax penalties on offshore companies. The magnitude of these penalties can be seen fromrepparttar 111866 examples below,

Real Estate Transfer Tax

This tax is paid byrepparttar 111867 purchaser, at progressive rates of up to 6% (5% for rural property) on property used exclusively for residential purposes, onrepparttar 111868 higher ofrepparttar 111869 registered value orrepparttar 111870 purchase price agreed betweenrepparttar 111871 parties. This is usuallyrepparttar 111872 purchase price.

For offshore companies this rate has been increased to 15%.

Municipal Property Tax

This is a tax, at a rate set annually, levied byrepparttar 111873 local authority and based onrepparttar 111874 registered value. The rates are different for urban and rural properties andrepparttar 111875 total is typically about 1.6%.

For offshore companiesrepparttar 111876 rate has been increased to 5%

Tax on a Deemed Rental Income

Where a property is owned by an offshore company, it is treated as having produced a rental income, which is charged to income tax, of one-fifteenth ofrepparttar 111877 registered value.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use